- From: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 23:32:35 -0500
- To: Web style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Vadim Plessky wrote:
> On Monday 24 September 2001 21:27, Etan Wexler wrote:
> | Vladimir Plessky wrote:
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> My name is Vadim.
Yes, and you have my apologies. I, too, am irritated by those who
criticize but cannot even get my name right.
> What's wrong when "scrollbar is handled in the same way as current
CSS
> box"?
The scrollbar has no place in the box model, nor do we have a standard
for addressing of the parts of a scrollbar. Even if the scrollbar had
a place in the box model, I would want the scrollbar to remain
functional and normal rather than tawdry and less usable. Sampo
Syreeni has made a good argument in another message
(<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2001Sep/0058.html>).
> * If you don't like some scrollbars on somebody else's page - you
can
> overwrite them with ! important definition in your custom (or
default)
> stylesheet.
/* user-power.css */
* {
cursor: auto !important;
overflow: auto !important;
resizer: both !important;
user-input: enabled !important;
user-modify: read-write !important;
scrollbar-style: normal !important;
}
> After all, you can have "custom stylesheet per host/domain name",
like
> Konqueror, for example, manages JavaScript and Java.
> But I think one custom stylesheet can serve your needs.
That style sheet would @import url("user-power.css"); .
The issue of user style sheets tailored per Web site (and per document
type) is worthy of its own, separate discussion.
--
Etan Wexler
Received on Monday, 1 October 2001 23:25:38 UTC