Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?)

On Wednesday 24 October 2001 23:33, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
|   * Vadim Plessky wrote:
|   >CSS3 has modular concept, which is Good.
|   >Unfortunately, number of modules is too big,
|
|   What modules? How to shrink them? Please provide
|   *constructive* critisism if you want anything changed.

*Constructive* critisism will follow fist official release of my CSS Test 
Suite. I hope it will be available *soon*, but can't give you confirmed date.
In the mean time, feel free to browse
http://htmltests.newmail.ru/css/
(you will see directory listing, and can preview individual files)
NOTE that files on that site are completely *unsupported*, I do not provide 
*completed self-descriptive explanation* for those tests, but if you have any 
clue about CSS in general and differences in differnet browser/UA 
implementations, I guess you will understand what I mean :-)
|
|   >and some modules look like rather useless for me.
|
|   That's probably your problem?!

No, that's th eproblem of those modules, and apparently, of W3C.
And I am here to *imprrove* those modules.
Again, constructive critics will follow soon. :-)

RE: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3
- was just the first my *constructive* proposal.
-- 

Vadim Plessky
http://kde2.newmail.ru  (English)
33 Window Decorations and 6 Widget Styles for KDE
http://kde2.newmail.ru/kde_themes.html
KDE mini-Themes
http://kde2.newmail.ru/themes/

Received on Thursday, 25 October 2001 04:11:26 UTC