- From: James Aylard <webmaster@pixelwright.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 00:51:50 -0400 (EDT)
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
- Cc: "Etan Wexler" <ewexler@stickdog.com>
Etan, > Sampo Syreeni makes the case for me (<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Pub > lic/www-style/2001Sep/0058.html>). He makes a decent argument, although not necessarily a compelling one. With little imagination, this argument could be extended to oppose virtually any form of designer-initiated interface modification. > Select elements and button elements in the document must be under the > influence of CSS, like any other element in the document. Parts of > the user agent (such as navigational buttons, control menus, and so > forth) should not be open to the influence of document authors. If usability is the concern, a select element and a button element are no less parts of the user interface than is a scrollbar -- and perhaps many users have become accustomed to the Stalinist gray typical of these elements, and will be confused by anything else. Usability is often (though not always) a balancing act between the aesthetic and the utilitarian. Whether scrollbars are part of the document interface or the application interface is debatable. I can "turn off" scrollbars by tinkering with an element's overflow property (including that of the document as a whole); or I can create them, on a div, for instance. It seems that it's a little late to declare scrollbars outside the sphere of CSS's influence. As for the elements of the browser chrome, those are part of the application UI, not the document UI, and as such should clearly be (and are clearly) outside the scope of CSS. But scrollbars are in, shall we say, a gray area, IMO -- and their coloration is a reasonable subject for discussion. James Aylard
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2001 09:36:58 UTC