- From: Jesse McCarthy <mccarthy36@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 19:39:32 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
Vadim Plessky <plessky@cnt.ru> wrote on 10/24/01 11:13:57 PM: >ok, for inline-block check this example >http://htmltests.newmail.ru/display-inline_block.html >screenshot (MS IE6) >http://htmltests.newmail.ru/display-inline_block-MSIE6.png I get 404 errors on those URLs. I don't have either of the browsers you mention, so I could only make use of a screen shot (though I'm not certain I have anything that will display the PNG). >| I think what you were talking about, and this is just a guess really, is >| having more than one block-level element on the same horizontal "line". If >| that's the case, why don't you float those blocks to the left? > >but I need those blocks *in place*, not floated. You'll have to excuse my denseness, but I'm not sure what you mean by "*in place*". ? >You can align blocks (vertically/horizontally), incl. (?) 'inline-block'. >You can't align LineText vertically, by definition. (only option I see is to >use Padding, but you need to find a way to inherit container's block >width/height values) Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean by "LineText". >What I proposed to consider is adding possibility to have block elements >inline, not breaking line. Well, I'm not going to argue with you. Honestly, I do not comprehend the situation you are describing or the particular problem you are having, and I don't know what the advantages and ramifications of what you're proposing would be.
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 19:50:04 UTC