Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3

On Monday 22 October 2001 15:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
|   Tantek Celik [mailto:tantek@cs.stanford.edu] wrote:
|   >Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru> wrote:
|   >> I expect that Konqueror browser (http://www.konqueror.org), part of
|   >> KDE project, will be fully compliant with CSS2 in 1 year time frame.
|   >
|   >If you achieve that - I think Chris Wilson is supposed to buy everybody
|   >in your company a beer or something.
|
|   Note that my actual statement was that if a single company ever
|   implemented _ALL_ of CSS2, so that I couldn't find any bugs or missing
|   parts, I would buy that company a beer.  No one, to my knowledge, has

Chris, can you clarify please: one beer to company, or one beer to every 
developer?
Is your offer valid for CSS3 as well?
(well, under CSS3  I mean here released modules covering Line-Text, BoxModel, 
Background, Color; and Positioning, Tables taken from CSS2)
There was no Ruby in CSS2, and I doubt implementing it makes sense for KHTML 
at a moment.  I have also too many complains on CSS3 UI module.

At a moment, I still have no final conclusion on Fonts module.
At a first glance, I was pleased to see 'hstem'/'vstem' in properties, but on 
another hand, this looks like too much internal / low-level font info.
Current Fonts module became, in terms of complexity, close to TrueType 
specification, and I am afraid that final WG recommendation can be (in terms 
of complexity/overhead) close to OpenType.
I doubt such complexity is really necessary. It would be nice to hear your 
opinion, though.
 
|   made it yet, though Angus Davis brazenly claimed success for Netscape a
|   couple of years ago.

Hmmm. May I ask you who is Angus Davis?

|
|   -Chris

-- 

Vadim Plessky
http://kde2.newmail.ru  (English)
33 Window Decorations and 6 Widget Styles for KDE
http://kde2.newmail.ru/kde_themes.html
KDE mini-Themes
http://kde2.newmail.ru/themes/

Received on Monday, 22 October 2001 17:01:51 UTC