Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) from Jesse McCarthy on 2001-10-24 (www-style@w3.org from October 2001)

From: Jesse McCarthy <mccarthy36@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 19:48:08 -0400
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <MWMail.oknglijn@host.none>

Vadim Plessky <plessky@cnt.ru> wrote on 10/24/01 10:52:00 PM:
>Ha-ha!.. 
>"The fact that the ability to achieve what I described does not exist in CSS 
>2 is abusrd"

>As about CSS - well, CSS development is not stopped (yet)
>So, we *can* make additions to CSS specs, and force changes.

Well there's no time like the present, of course it could well be too late to 
make it into this generation of browsers anyway. 

>CSS3 has modular concept, which is Good.
>Unfortunately, number of modules is too big, and some modules look like 
>rather useless for me.

Isn't that the point of modularity?

Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 19:53:05 UTC