- From: Rowland Shaw <Rowland.Shaw@crystaldecisions.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 01:08:30 -0700
- To: "'Daniel BODEA'" <dali@dali-designs.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
> > > Given an <img style="display: none">, is the navigator required to > > > download the image and cache it or not? Moreover, is this a standard > > > or should each navigator implement its behaviour the way it sees > > > fit? After some experimentation, it seems IE 5.5 does download and > > > cache the images though Netscape still doesn't work. > > > There's no need to download the image with display: none; so it probably > > isn't under Gecko based browsers, of which Netscape 6 is one. > > My question still is... is this behaviour (display: none <=> download) > clearly defined in any spec or not? From reading the relevant section of the CSS2 spec [ http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/visuren.html#propdef-display ] it merely states the element will create no boxes in the formatting structure. I'd expect the guys at Netscape will argue their case of saving downloads of content "not required". My personal thought on this is if we're not going to display this visual element, we don't need to download it (just yet). However, I would expect the user agent to hold on to the image data if it's display property changes to a visual state (in this case, inline), even if it goes non visual again.
Received on Monday, 1 October 2001 04:09:04 UTC