- From: Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru>
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 16:23:47 +0000
- To: Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sunday 21 October 2001 08:14, Tantek Celik wrote: | From: Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru> | Subject: Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in | CSS3 | Date: Thu, Oct 18, 2001, 6:50 PM | > Ok, yes, I think that amrgin: auto is rather confusing. | > May be., there should be something like | > vertical-align: center | > and | > horizontal-align: center | left | right | > I am interested here in blocks. | | Yes, or perhaps 'block-align'. | 'block-align' sounds better, in case we allow it to be aligned both in vertical and horizontal directions :-) Do you think that this also can be included in CSS 2.1, or we should wait CSS3 (and include it in CSS3 BoxModel module, in the mean time)? | > Analyzing HTML generated by DTP packages (Quark, Adobe InDesign), I | > found that they use very easy approach - position everything in | > absolute coordinates. | | Easy, but inflexible. Positioning does not translate very well to | different resolutions, different devices. Achieving proper "liquid" | layouts is much more challenging. That's was my point. I am gald that you agree with it. In my opinion, 'block-align'.and 'display: inline-block' fix all major outstanding issues. There is also some work which should be done for Tables, but even these two additions are quite important and clarify a lot. So, what can be the next step?.. :-)) -- Vadim Plessky http://kde2.newmail.ru (English) 33 Window Decorations and 6 Widget Styles for KDE http://kde2.newmail.ru/kde_themes.html KDE mini-Themes http://kde2.newmail.ru/themes/
Received on Sunday, 21 October 2001 08:18:45 UTC