w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from January to March 2002 by date

Monday, 1 April 2002

• Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 31 March 2002

• Re: visual and auditory navigation: examples needed Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: F2F notes for discussion of illustrating text checkpoint Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: zoom tool-tips Matt May
• Re: zoom tool-tips jonathan chetwynd
• Re: F2F notes for discussion of illustrating text checkpoint Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: visual and auditory navigation: examples needed Al Gilman
• Re: zoom tool-tips Al Gilman
• zoom tool-tips jonathan chetwynd
• Re: visual and auditory navigation: examples needed jonathan chetwynd
• Re: F2F notes for discussion of illustrating text checkpoint Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: visual and auditory navigation: examples needed Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 29 March 2002

• F2F notes for discussion of illustrating text checkpoint Wendy A Chisholm
• Minutes from F2F Wendy A Chisholm

Thursday, 28 March 2002

• Minutes - 28 March 2002 WCAG WG telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• Regrets Kynn Bartlett
• regrets Jo Miller
• RE: regrets Annuska Perkins
• Re: question re WCAG 1.0 Wendy A Chisholm
• One sentence summary of WCAG 2.0 Paul Bohman
• regrets Mark Stimson
• W3C Weekly News - 25 March 2002 by way of Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: word comprhension Al Gilman
• RE: Questions from Face to Face Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: word comprhension Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: visual and auditory navigation: examples needed Eric Velleman
• Re: word comprhension jonathan chetwynd
• RE: Questions from Face to Face Bob Regan
• visual and auditory navigation: examples needed jonathan chetwynd
• Re: word comprhension Al Gilman
• Re: word comprhension Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: WCAG 2 Restructuring Proposal comments Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• word comprhension Steven.Faulkner@visionaustralia.org.au

Wednesday, 27 March 2002

• meeting gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• Clarifications on Questions from Face to Face............. Katie Haritos-Shea
• Agenda Jason White
• Re: Questions from Face to Face Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: question re WCAG 1.0 Chuck Letourneau
• Re: Questions from Face to Face Joe Clark

Tuesday, 26 March 2002

• Re: question re WCAG 1.0 Charles McCathieNevile
• question re WCAG 1.0 Mark Stimson
• RE: Questions from Face to Face Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Questions from Face to Face Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: WCAG 2 Restructuring Proposal comments Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: WCAG 2 Restructuring Proposal comments Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Multiple versions of a page phoenixl
• RE: Multiple versions of a page Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Multiple versions of a page phoenixl
• Questions from Face to Face Bob Regan

Monday, 25 March 2002

• WCAG 2 Restructuring Proposal comments Joe Clark
• RE: Multiple versions of a page phoenixl

Sunday, 24 March 2002

• RE: Multiple versions of a page Marja-Riitta Koivunen
• RE: Multiple versions of a page phoenixl
• RE: Multiple versions of a page phoenixl

Saturday, 23 March 2002

• NOT new WCAG 2.0 doc -- New WCAG 2.0 Proposal Doc Gregg Vanderheiden
• Location details of F2F meetings Wendy A Chisholm
• New WCAG 2.0 Doc Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Multiple versions of a page Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Multiple versions of a page Jason White
• RE: Multiple versions of a page phoenixl
• RE: Multiple versions of a page phoenixl
• RE: Multiple versions of a page phoenixl
• RE: Multiple versions of a page phoenixl

Friday, 22 March 2002

• Request to Join by way of Wendy A Chisholm

Thursday, 21 March 2002

• Re: comments 1, 3 and 6 Matt May
• RE: comments 1, 3 and 6 Robert Neff
• Re: comments 1, 3 and 6 Matt May
• Comment 6 - Code used an example Robert Neff
• Comment 5 -Form Controls Robert Neff
• Comment 5 -Form Controls Robert Neff
• Comment 7 - Linearizing Table versus Table for Layout Robert Neff
• Comment 4 - Access keys Robert Neff
• RE: New WCAG 2 HTML techniques document posted Robert Neff
• RE: New WCAG 2 HTML techniques document posted Robert Neff
• RE: New WCAG 2 HTML techniques document posted Robert Neff
• New WCAG 2 HTML techniques document posted Matt May
• RE: Multiple versions of a page Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 20 March 2002

• No meeting tomorrow Jason White
• RE: Multiple versions of a page Kynn Bartlett
• I'll be 1/2 hour late for tomorrow's meeting Cynthia Shelly
• Re: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: Multiple versions of a page Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Multiple versions of a page gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• my action item: 4.1, 4.2 & 4.4 Cynthia Shelly
• RE: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility gian@stanleymilford.com.au

Tuesday, 19 March 2002

• RE: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility Cynthia Shelly
• RE: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• W3C Weekly News - 18 March 2002 by way of Wendy A Chisholm

Monday, 18 March 2002

• Re: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility Loretta Guarino Reid
• Re: SVG techniques Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Multiple versions of a page Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• RE: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• RE: Multiple versions of a page Jason White
• RE: Multiple versions of a page phoenixl

Saturday, 16 March 2002

• RE: Multiple versions of a page Jason White
• RE: Multiple versions of a page phoenixl

Friday, 15 March 2002

• Re: of musical notes -qq-dd- and telling a story. Marja-Riitta Koivunen
• Art and unchangeable text Re: More useful information for 3.3 Charles McCathieNevile
• SVG techniques Charles McCathieNevile
• Conformance dimension: technology support Jason White

Thursday, 14 March 2002

• 14 March 2002 telecon minutes Wendy A Chisholm
• of musical notes -qq-dd- and telling a story. Jonathan Chetwynd
• Regrets Lee Roberts
• RE: Agenda - Regrets Slaydon, Eugenia
• Leaving a tad early today Mark Stimson
• Regrets Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Audience (was Re: More useful information for 3.3) Charles McCathieNevile
• regrets for at least half of today's call Cynthia Shelly
• Re: More useful information for 3.3 Charles McCathieNevile
• regrets? Jo Miller
• RE: More useful information for 3.3 Jo Miller
• Re: More useful information for 3.3 Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: action item for the testability of 3.5 (annotating complexinformation) Lisa Seeman
• Re: More useful information for 3.3 Lisa Seeman
• Re: Agenda goliver@accease.com
• What is disability? goliver@accease.com
• RE: action item for the testability of 3.5 (annotating complex information) Annuska Perkins
• Audience (was Re: More useful information for 3.3) Jason White
• Apologies Jonathan O'Donnell
• Re: More useful information for 3.3 goliver@accease.com
• RE: More useful information for 3.3 Lee Otto

Wednesday, 13 March 2002

• Re: More useful information for 3.3 Jason White
• Re: Agenda kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: More useful information for 3.3 Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Re: Sign language equivalents Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: Sign language equivalents Chuck Hitchcock
• More useful information for 3.3 Jo Miller
• Fw: Checkpoint 3.3 Lisa Seeman
• Fw: Checkpoint 3.3 Lisa Seeman
• Fw: Checkpoint 3.3 Lisa Seeman
• Re: Agenda - More useful information for 3.3 goliver@accease.com
• Sign language equivalents Lee Otto

Tuesday, 12 March 2002

• Agenda Jason White
• FW: minutes gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• RE: Sign language equivalents Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Sign language equivalents Slaydon, Eugenia
• RE: Sign language equivalents Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Sign language equivalents Slaydon, Eugenia
• RE: Multiple versions of a page Charles McCathieNevile
• Sign language equivalents Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 10 March 2002

• Re: minutes Lisa Seeman

Monday, 11 March 2002

• Re: Useful Reference for 3.3 Jo Miller
• Checkpoint 3.3 Jo Miller

Friday, 8 March 2002

• Re: Multiple versions of a page phoenixl
• RE: Multiple versions of a page phoenixl
• Re: Multiple versions of a page phoenixl
• Re: Multiple versions of a page by way of Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Multiple versions of a page Lisa Seeman
• RE: Multiple versions of a page gian@stanleymilford.com.au

Thursday, 7 March 2002

• Phone info, Updated agenda added to meeting page for 23/24 March F2F Wendy A Chisholm
• minutes gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• RE: Agenda Cynthia Shelly
• RE: Agenda Paul Bohman
• Re: Agenda goliver@accease.com
• HTML Techniques Issues List - Thanks, Andi Wendy A Chisholm
• REGRETS Gregg Vanderheiden
• Multiple versions of a page Lee Otto

Wednesday, 6 March 2002

• Re: server-side diversity is OK, <big IF/> phoenixl
• Useful Reference for 3.3 goliver@accease.com

Tuesday, 5 March 2002

• Agenda Jason White
• W3C Weekly News - 4 March 2002 by way of Wendy A Chisholm

Monday, 4 March 2002

• Re: Re : NEW Checkpoint 4.S.1 (taken from S-1. Goes in Section 4. ) phoenixl

Sunday, 3 March 2002

• Re: source + try harder as an option phoenixl
• server-side diversity is OK, <big IF/> Al Gilman
• Re : NEW Checkpoint 4.S.1 (taken from S-1. Goes in Section 4. ) goliver@accease.com

Saturday, 2 March 2002

• RE: Reconsidering the wording of our main guidelines goliver@accease.com

Friday, 1 March 2002

• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Lori L. Paparteys
• RE: Reconsidering the wording of our main guidelines Paul Bohman
• source + try harder as an option Al Gilman
• minutes available in HTML Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Reconsidering the wording of our main guidelines Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• RE: Reconsidering the wording of our main guidelines gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• Minutes from Feb. 28, 2002 Loretta Guarino Reid
• 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility goliver@accease.com

Thursday, 28 February 2002

• Re: Checkpoint 3.3 Jo Miller
• Regrets Lee Roberts
• Regrets Andi Snow-Weaver
• RE: Agenda - Regrets Slaydon, Eugenia
• Checkpoint 3.3 Jo Miller
• RE: Agenda Paul Bohman
• Re: regrets Lori L. Paparteys
• Re: regrets Charles McCathieNevile
• regrets Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: 3.3 feedback Lee Roberts
• 3.3 feedback Lisa Seeman
• regrets Annuska Perkins
• Re: Agenda kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com

Wednesday, 27 February 2002

• Agenda Jason White

Monday, 25 February 2002

• Re: Conclusions from Discussion today kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com

Sunday, 24 February 2002

• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review goliver@accease.com
• Re: Conclusions from Discussion today Lisa Seeman

Friday, 22 February 2002

• W3C process Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: NEW Checkpoint 4.S.1 (taken from S-1. Goes in Section 4. ) phoenixl
• RE: Conclusions from Discussion today Cynthia Shelly
• Re: Conclusions from Discussion today Kynn Bartlett
• RE: spec-waving Philistines [was: RE: Conclusions from Discussion today] Lee Roberts
• spec-waving Philistines [was: RE: Conclusions from Discussion today] Al Gilman
• RE: Conclusions from Discussion today Lee Roberts
• Re: Conclusions from Discussion today Jim Ley
• Re: NEW Checkpoint 4.S.1 (taken from S-1. Goes in Section 4. ) Lisa Seeman
• Re: Conclusions from Discussion today Lisa Seeman
• RE: Reconsidering the wording of our main guidelines Paul Bohman
• Reconsidering the wording of our main guidelines Paul Bohman

Thursday, 21 February 2002

• Re: 21 February 2002 - WCAG WG Minutes Loretta Guarino Reid
• 21 February 2002 - WCAG WG Minutes Wendy A Chisholm
• Regrets Lori L. Paparteys
• Regrets Lee Roberts
• RE: NEW Checkpoint 4.S.1 (taken from S-1. Goes in Section 4. ) Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Checkpoint 4.3 action item Wendy A Chisholm
• Regrets for 2/21/02 Jenae Andershonis
• Checkpoint 4.3 action item Jason White
• many apologies gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• Fw: Feedback on accessibility techniques for cognitive disabilities Lisa Seeman

Wednesday, 20 February 2002

• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review Jason White

Tuesday, 19 February 2002

• Agenda Jason White
• Checkpoint 4.2 Review by way of Wendy A Chisholm
• W3C Weekly News - 18 February 2002 by way of Wendy A Chisholm

Monday, 18 February 2002

• Re: Page Size (kb), line speed and accessibility (no checkpoint number) Charles McCathieNevile
• WCAG 2.0 and non-text equivalents Danny Roush
• RE: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Suggested Benefit) Slaydon, Eugenia
• Page Size (kb), line speed and accessibility (no checkpoint number) goliver@accease.com
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Suggested Benefit) goliver@accease.com
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review Jim Ley
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review goliver@accease.com
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review goliver@accease.com
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review Charles McCathieNevile
• Automated reply from rosie@www.ssbtechnologies.com rosie@www.ssbtechnologies.com
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review goliver@accease.com

Friday, 15 February 2002

• Re: NEW Checkpoint 4.S.1 (taken from S-1. Goes in Section 4. ) phoenixl
• NEW Checkpoint 4.S.1 (taken from S-1. Goes in Section 4. ) Gregg Vanderheiden
• FW: Conclusions from Discussion today Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Interesting new assistive tech Charles McCathieNevile
• REQUEST -- include checkpoint number somewhere in your Subject Line Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Interesting new assistive tech Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 14 February 2002

• Valentine's Day WCAG WG minutes Wendy A Chisholm
• Apologies Jonathan O'Donnell
• Re: Agenda Kynn Bartlett

Wednesday, 13 February 2002

• Request to join Ben Caldwell
• RE: Agenda Annuska Perkins
• RE: Agenda Cynthia Shelly
• Apologies Geoff Deering

Thursday, 14 February 2002

• Fw: accessibility for cognitive disabilities Lisa Seeman

Wednesday, 13 February 2002

• Re: Agenda Lori L. Paparteys
• Re: Agenda Charles McCathieNevile
• Agenda Jason White

Tuesday, 12 February 2002

• Re: Fwd: W3C Weekly News - 11 February 2002 Charles McCathieNevile
• Fwd: W3C Weekly News - 11 February 2002 Kynn Bartlett
• mail test Lee Roberts
• W3C Weekly News - 11 February 2002 by way of Wendy A Chisholm

Monday, 11 February 2002

• Discussion: How to weight different accessibility warnings? (fwd) Nick Kew
• RE: Checkpoint 3.3 Research Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Checkpoint 3.3 Research Lee Roberts
• Re: Checkpoint 3.3 Research Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Checkpoint 3.3 Research Lisa Seeman
• Re: Checkpoint 3.3 Research Lisa Seeman

Sunday, 10 February 2002

• Colorblindness Lee Roberts
• Checkpoint 3.3 Research Lee Roberts
• Re: Checkpoint 3.3 Research Jo Miller

Saturday, 9 February 2002

• Re: Checkpoint 3.3 Research Kynn Bartlett
• Checkpoint 3.3 Research Lee Roberts
• Re: Interesting article: How to read W3C specs Kynn Bartlett
• Minutes from Feb 7, 2002 Loretta Guarino Reid

Friday, 8 February 2002

• Interesting new assistive tech Cynthia Shelly

Thursday, 7 February 2002

• Interesting article: How to read W3C specs Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Checkpoint 4.4 Review gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• regrets for the rest of the meeting Cynthia Shelly
• RE: Checkpoint 4.4 Review Cynthia Shelly
• Regrets and info on action item Mark Stimson
• Regrets Lee Roberts
• REGRETS Annuska Perkins
• REGRETS Katie Haritos-Shea
• Regrets Jonathan O'Donnell
• Baseline Browser Characteristics Kynn Bartlett

Wednesday, 6 February 2002

• RE: Checkpoint 4.4 Review gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review Matt May
• RE: Checkpoint 4.4 Review gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• RE: Objective Views 3.3 Lee Roberts
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: 3.3 action ! Jonathan O'Donnell
• Re: Objective Views 3.3 Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: text as images... Charles McCathieNevile
• Checkpoint 4.4 Review Gregg Vanderheiden
• Regrets Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html Kynn Bartlett
• Re: text as images... Charles F. Munat
• RE: text as images... Kynn Bartlett
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html Charles F. Munat
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html Kynn Bartlett
• RE: text as images... gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html Kynn Bartlett
• Re: text as images... Charles F. Munat
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html Charles F. Munat

Tuesday, 5 February 2002

• Re: text as images... Kynn Bartlett
• Regrets for 7 February Kynn Bartlett
• Re: text as images... Charles F. Munat
• Agenda Jason White
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Request for advise for reporting Wendy A Chisholm
• Defn of Normative (was: Re: 24 January 2002 WCAG WG minutes - Definition of Normative) Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: /colour/colourblindness.html gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• RE: text as images... gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• March F2F registration is open until 15 March 2002 Wendy A Chisholm
• Apologies Geoff Deering
• RE: /colour/colourblindness.html Lee Roberts
• Objective Views 3.3 Lee Roberts
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html Kynn Bartlett
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html by way of Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html jonathan chetwynd
• /colour/colourblindness.html by way of Wendy A Chisholm

Monday, 4 February 2002

• Request to jon WAI working group Andrew C. Wiss
• W3C Weekly News - 4 February 2002 by way of Wendy A Chisholm
• CSS and downlevel browsers was Re: text as images... Matt May
• RE: text as images... Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Dumb Thought on alt Text (or Smart Thought?) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: 3.3 action ! Lisa Seeman

Sunday, 3 February 2002

• Request for advise for reporting Lee Roberts
• RE: text as images... Lee Roberts

Monday, 4 February 2002

• RE: Dumb Thought on alt Text (or Smart Thought?) gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• Post regrets gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• RE: text as images... gian@stanleymilford.com.au

Sunday, 3 February 2002

• Re: Dumb Thought on alt Text (or Smart Thought?) Charles McCathieNevile
• longish response RE: 3.3 action ! Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: 3.3 action ! Bob Regan

Monday, 4 February 2002

• Fw: 3.3 action ! Lisa Seeman

Saturday, 2 February 2002

• Dumb Thought on alt Text (or Smart Thought?) Kynn Bartlett
• RE: is the needed proxy available? etc. Jason White

Friday, 1 February 2002

• RE: is the needed proxy available? etc. Cynthia Shelly
• Re: text as images... Matt May
• Re: text as images... Kynn Bartlett
• Re: text as images... Matt May
• is the needed proxy available? etc. Al Gilman
• Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Kynn Bartlett
• RE: text as images... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Al Gilman
• 31 January 2002 WCAG WG minutes   Andi Snow-Weaver
• Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Jim Ley
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 31 January 2002

• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Wendy A Chisholm
• Regrets Paul Bohman
• REGRETS Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Jo Miller
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Charles McCathieNevile
• [glossary] Re: 24 January 2002 WCAG WG minutes - Definition of Normative Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: 24 January 2002 WCAG WG minutes - Definition of Normative Jonathan O'Donnell

Wednesday, 30 January 2002

• RE: suggestions for where working group members can get involved Geoff Deering
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Gregg Vanderheiden
• Agenda Jason White

Tuesday, 29 January 2002

• RE: suggestions for where working group members can get involved. Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: suggestions for where working group members can get involved. Slaydon, Eugenia
• Re: suggestions for where working group members can get involved. Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: suggestions for where working group members can get involved. Slaydon, Eugenia
• Re: suggestions for where working group members can get involved. Slaydon, Eugenia
• RE: WCAG1 10.3 Charles McCathieNevile
• Fwd: W3C Weekly News - 28 January 2002 Wendy A Chisholm

Monday, 28 January 2002

• RE: WCAG1 10.3 gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: search as an access asset Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Lee Roberts
• search as an access asset Al Gilman
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 goliver@accease.com
• Re: Accessibility and Usability goliver@accease.com
• Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC goliver@accease.com
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: OTHER CONTRIBUTORS Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Accessibility and Usability Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 Kynn Bartlett

Sunday, 27 January 2002

• Re: suggestions for where working group members can get involved goliver@accease.com
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 goliver@accease.com
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 goliver@accease.com
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com

Saturday, 26 January 2002

• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: WCAG1 10.3 kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• WCAG1 10.3 Lee Roberts
• RE: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 Lee Roberts
• Points to consider in writing success criteria Jason White
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 Al Gilman

Friday, 25 January 2002

• Next F2F meeting: 23-24 March, L.A., California, USA Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: suggestions for where working group members can get involved Jason White
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 Al Gilman
• Re: action item for the testability of 3.5 (annotating complex information) Jim Ley
• Re: action item for the testability of 3.5 (annotating complex information) Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: suggestions for where working group members can get involved Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: suggestions for where working group members can get involved goliver@accease.com
• Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 goliver@accease.com
• Re: OTHER CONTRIBUTORS goliver@accease.com
• Re: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Jim Ley
• OTHER CONTRIBUTORS Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• Re: 24 January 2002 WCAG WG minutes - Definition of Normative goliver@accease.com
• FW: text as images... gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• RE: text as images... gian@stanleymilford.com.au

Thursday, 24 January 2002

• suggestions for where working group members can get involved Wendy A Chisholm
• 24 January 2002 WCAG WG minutes Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: text as images... Geoff Deering
• RE: level A and double A RE: rationalize presentation Geoff Deering
• Review of WCAG 2.0 checkpoint 4.4 Jim Ley
• Review of WCAG 2.0 checkpoint 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 Jim Ley
• Review of WCAG 2.0 checkpoint 2.2,2.3,2.5 and 2.7 Jim Ley
• Review of WCAG 2.0 checkpoint 1.1 (and 2 a bit) Jim Ley
• Review of WCAG 2.0 Intro and checkpoint 1.5 Jim Ley
• RE: level A and double A RE: rationalize presentation Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: 4.1 action item Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: text as images... Wendy A Chisholm
• Members in Good Standing Gregg Vanderheiden
• text as images... Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 23 January 2002

• W3C Weekly News - 21 January 2002 Wendy A Chisholm
• W3C Weekly News (22 December 2001 - 14 January 2002) Wendy A Chisholm
• regrets for (most of) tomorrow's meeting Cynthia Shelly
• RE: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation Geoff Deering
• Re: Open Issue 77 ? Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation Jim Ley
• Re: level A and double A kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• RE: level A and double A Charles McCathieNevile
• Regrets Lee Roberts
• Open Issue 77 ? Jim Ley
• RE: Agenda Geoff Deering
• RE: Active Participants Listing Geoff Deering
• RE: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation Geoff Deering
• Re: action item for the testability of 3.5 (annotating complex information) Jason White
• action item for the testability of 3.5 (annotating complex information) Annuska Perkins
• RE: WG charter & text as images gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• WG charter gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• Agenda Jason White
• Re: Active Participants Listing BottomsupCo@aol.com

Tuesday, 22 January 2002

• Re: Active Participants Listing Kynn Bartlett
• RE: 4.1 action item Slaydon, Eugenia
• 4.1 action item Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: Active Participants Listing Slaydon, Eugenia
• RE: level A and double A Kynn Bartlett
• RE: level A and double A Geoff Deering
• RE: level A and double A RE: rationalize presentation Geoff Deering
• Re: Active Participants Listing Lee Roberts
• Re: Active Participants Listing jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Active Participants Listing Lori L. Paparteys
• Re: Active Participants Listing Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Active Participants Listing Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Active Participants Listing Slaydon, Eugenia
• Re: Active Participants Listing Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Active Participants Listing Kynn Bartlett
• Why navbars are important Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Charles McCathieNevile
• Active Participants Listing Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Geoff Deering

Monday, 21 January 2002

• Re: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation Jim Ley
• Re: level A and double A Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation Kynn Bartlett
• Re: level A and double A Kynn Bartlett
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Charles McCathieNevile
• level A and double A RE: rationalize presentation Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation Geoff Deering
• RE: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation Geoff Deering
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Geoff Deering
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Kynn Bartlett
• Re: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation Kynn Bartlett

Sunday, 20 January 2002

• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Charles McCathieNevile
• checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Kynn Bartlett

Saturday, 19 January 2002

• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Geoff Deering

Friday, 18 January 2002

• Balancing consistency and differences Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: 3.3 action item Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Re Please review Requirements for WCAG 2.0 (deadline 18 January) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re Please review Requirements for WCAG 2.0 (deadline 18 January) by way of Wendy A Chisholm
• "Until User Agents" in WCAG techniques for 2.0 Jason White
• 3.3 action item Lisa Seeman
• Re: WCAG1 10.2 (until user agents) Jason White
• Re: WCAG1 10.2 (until user agents) Kynn Bartlett
• Re: WCAG1 10.2 (until user agents) Jason White
• minutes from 17 January Loretta Guarino Reid
• Checkpoint 3.2 Jason White

Thursday, 17 January 2002

• WCAG1 10.2 (until user agents) Kynn Bartlett
• Recognized media types for checkpoint 3.2 Wendy A Chisholm
• Late regrets for 1/17/02 Andi Snow-Weaver
• Regrets Mark Stimson
• Regrets Slaydon, Eugenia
• regrets for today's meeting <eom> Cynthia Shelly
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names, proposal Jo Miller
• Re: Agenda - regrets Jo Miller
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names, proposal Jo Miller
• RE: rationalize presentation Bailey, Bruce

Wednesday, 16 January 2002

• Regrets Lee Roberts

Thursday, 17 January 2002

• Re: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Jim Ley

Wednesday, 16 January 2002

• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Cynthia Shelly
• RE: [CSS-TECHS] drop caps, :first-letter Slaydon, Eugenia
• Request to Join Lee Roberts
• [CSS-TECHS] Issues list (was: Issues since 9/20/00) Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: [CSS-TECHS] drop caps, :first-letter Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: [CSS-TECHS] drop caps, :first-letter Slaydon, Eugenia
• [CSS-TECHS] drop caps, :first-letter Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: FAQ plan Lisa Seeman
• Re: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names, proposal Wendy A Chisholm

Tuesday, 15 January 2002

• Agenda Jason White
• FAQ plan Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Slaydon, Eugenia
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names? Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names? Jonathan O'Donnell
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names? Jason White
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names? Jo Miller
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names? Kynn Bartlett

Monday, 14 January 2002

• [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names? Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] gian@stanleymilford.com.au

Friday, 11 January 2002

• RE: NOtes from GL meeting 12/10/02 Cynthia Shelly
• NOtes from GL meeting 12/10/02 Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 10 January 2002

• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• minutes from 10 january Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: partial regrets Annuska Perkins
• partial regrets Mark Stimson
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Geoff Deering
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Geoff Deering
• Regrets Katie Haritos-Shea
• lots on agenda Lisa Seeman
• Steal this post [was: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation]] Charles F. Munat
• Re: Agenda Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Slaydon, Eugenia
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• Agenda Jason White

Wednesday, 9 January 2002

• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Geoff Deering
• data error recovery, data persistence, and LD access to forms transactions Al Gilman
• my two cents on minutes of 3 January 2002 Telecon Lisa Seeman

Tuesday, 8 January 2002

• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• Re: The Order of Checkpoint Priorities Matt May
• RE: The Order of Checkpoint Priorities Geoff Deering
• RE: The Order of Checkpoint Priorities Geoff Deering
• Re: The Order of Checkpoint Priorities Charles McCathieNevile
• The Order of Checkpoint Priorities Geoff Deering
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Geoff Deering

Sunday, 6 January 2002

• RE: event handlers Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Charles McCathieNevile
• Implementing CC/PP Re: A single URI Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 3 January 2002

• Regrets for Jan 03, 2002 Andi Snow-Weaver

Friday, 4 January 2002

• rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] Al Gilman
• Different entry methods Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: event handlers Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Annuska Perkins
• RE: Use consistent presentation Katie Haritos-Shea
• event handlers Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Please review Requirements for WCAG 2.0 (deadline 18 January) Al Gilman
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Gregg Vanderheiden
• Use consistent presentation gian@stanleymilford.com.au

Thursday, 3 January 2002

• minutes of 3 January 2002 Telecon Jo Miller
• Re: Agenda Charles McCathieNevile
• Agenda Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page Charles McCathieNevile
• regrets Wendy A Chisholm

Wednesday, 2 January 2002

• Re: AW: transparency of black? drop-down menu jonathan chetwynd
• transparency of positioned content was Re: transparency of black? drop-down menu Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: transparency of black? drop-down menu Jim Ley
• RE: CSS versus tables Andrew McFarland
• RE: CSS versus tables Andrew McFarland
• RE: CSS versus tables Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: CSS versus tables PERRY, Grant
• RE: CSS versus tables Slaydon, Eugenia
• RE: CSS versus tables Slaydon, Eugenia

Tuesday, 1 January 2002

• Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) Jim Ley
• RE: CSS versus tables Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: ems versus pixels Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: ems versus pixels Rowan Smith
• Re: Please review Requirements for WCAG 2.0 (deadline 18 January) Jo Miller
• AW: transparency of black? drop-down menu Jan Eric Hellbusch
• transparency of black? drop-down menu jonathan chetwynd
• RE: CSS versus tables Scott Luebking
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) Scott Luebking
• Re: ems versus pixels Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: CSS versus tables Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page Jason White
• Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) Jason White
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2002 22:53:12 UTC