- From: Slaydon, Eugenia <ESlaydon@beacontec.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:03:49 -0500
- To: "'goliver@accease.com'" <goliver@accease.com>, GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Yes, can someone please clarify? My understanding of this is completely different. I'm under the impression that some of the tools that some people are 'forced' to use (e.g. only this browser works with this software that makes items accessible to them), do not provide Javascript support. So anything within the script is inaccessible to them. Not so much a question of 'make sense' but more like 'not available'. Eugenia Lead Content Developer Beacon Technologies, Inc. 336-931-1295 ext 225 -----Original Message----- From: goliver@accease.com [mailto:goliver@accease.com] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 3:45 PM To: GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Suggested Benefit) My understanding is that some people with disabilities have to switch off Javascript in order to 'make sense' or 'successfully use' some web sites. Can someone confirm this and perhaps give a specific example? Then I will word a 'Benefit' of making pages work when scripts are not available. Cheers Graham AccEase Ltd : Making on-line information accessible Phone : +64 9 846 6995 Email : goliver@accease.com
Received on Monday, 18 February 2002 15:59:01 UTC