Re: Active Participants Listing

I agree guys. I'd love to join some of the groups, but am unable to attend
the meetings, so I've held off because I don't want to be in bad standing.
We should think of a way to redo our meetings. BTW, I'm new to this group.
I'm also in the CSS group and the HTML group. I'm just learning things about
accessibility.
                 Lori L. Paparteys
                     A+ certified computer technician
                      Webmaster: http://currieweb.com/121stnyvi
                                         www.currieweb.com



----- Original Message -----
From: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
To: <GV@trace.wisc.edu>; "GLWAI Guidelines WG (GL - WAI Guidelines WG)"
<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: Active Participants Listing


> At 12:33 AM -0600 1/22/02, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
> >Such members are expected
> >to attend most all of the working group sessions. Members who do not
> >attend at least 2/3 of the meetings are usually not considered in good
> >standing.
>
> Some of us (e.g. the unemployed) have difficulties making weekly
> lengthy long-distance calls.  Perhaps we need to reconsider our
> method of meeting.
>
> --Kynn, inactive member in bad standing
>
> --
> Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>                 http://kynn.com
> Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain            http://idyllmtn.com
> Web Accessibility Expert-for-hire          http://kynn.com/resume
> January Web Accessibility eCourse           http://kynn.com/+d201
> Forthcoming: Teach Yourself CSS in 24 Hours
>

Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2002 12:56:25 UTC