- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 21:08:10 -0000
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
The review mainly focuses on WCAG 2.0 and its relation to scripting. I've tried to split it across mailings which roughly equate to checkpoints. Scripting [1], is very prevalent on the web, almost all sites of any size use scripting, yet developers are very poor when combining script and accessibility, indeed the majority of developers currently have a "it works ok in IE" mentality, and even with that they mean "Default configuration of IE with mouse etc." Cross browser compatibility isn't enough of an issue, let alone Accessibility. In general I use scripting as suggestions which improve usability/understandability/accessibility like CSS does with presentation and it certainly doesn't have a text equivalent [2]. The WCAG 2 document (and the WG) appears to see scripts differently from this, and put it across in such a way as it makes people think "can't use script" or "must produce script and non-script site" to achieve compliance. It would be nice if Checkpoint 1.5 could include this in some way, unfortunately I haven't been able to come up with a suggestion though. Jim. [1] ECMAScript in reality, with only IE and Icestorm supporting any other language. [2] Currently often breaking accessibility to achieve usability.
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2002 16:11:35 UTC