Re: Active Participants Listing

The W3C Process document defines participants in good standing:
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010719/groups.html#good-standing

At 01:33 AM 1/22/02, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
>Dear GL Listmembers,
> 
>As part of the New Year we are trying to follow the W3C process
>guidelines for our group more closely.  One of the components is the
>maintaining of a list of active members of the working group that are in
>good standing. Generally the working group is made up of a small group
>of people who meet consistently and regularly. Such members are expected
>to attend most all of the working group sessions. Members who do not
>attend at least 2/3 of the meetings are usually not considered in good
>standing.
> 
>In our work we have many who cannot meet this standard for active
>membership but who do still contribute on the list or periodically. They
>don't fit the W3C definition of active members in good standing but we
>want you all to know that we value your/their contributions very much
>and find them an integral part of our work.
> 
>For those interested in the list of the current active members in good
>standing you will find it posted on our GL website at
>http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/participants.html#good-standing
>  
>To this group -- thanks for all your time and dedication. The workgroups
>are well named. It is a lot of work and we appreciate your particular
>dedication to the group.
> 
>To the rest of our unofficial extended working group and contributors,
>keep up the good work.
> 
>Thanks
> 
> Gregg Vanderheiden
> Jason White
> WCAG Co Chairs

-- 
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium 
web accessibility initiative
seattle, wa usa
/--

Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2002 12:17:55 UTC