- From: <gian@stanleymilford.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:17:54 +1100
- TO: Lee.Otto@aspect.com.au, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-Id: <H00000e0003e09e2.1015546673.tux.sofcom.com.au@MHS>
Hi, I think Lee is right, and one major problem with having multiple versions of a web page is that we can NEVER know the variety of disabilities a person may have, and therefore splitting an accessible web site into several sites can end up making that site essentially inaccessible. What I mean, is that if someone needs checkpoints A and B to access a site will not be able to do so if checkpoint A is solved by Site Version 1, and checkpoint B by Site Version 3. Cheers, Gian > -----Original Message----- > From: Lee.Otto [mailto:Lee.Otto@aspect.com.au] > Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2002 2:56 PM > To: w3c-wai-gl > Subject: Multiple versions of a page > > > Hi, > For some months now I have been reading with great interest > the debate that > has raged. Quite frankly I haven't participated before > because someone else > usually had the same viewpoint. > > The issue of multiple versions of a page has however seemed > to be missing 1 > point. If you have already covered this, then I apologise - > just ignore > this email. Focusing on abilities is better than focusing > on disabilities. > It's important to remember that very often particularly if > the disability is > intellectual or cognitive, that it is accompanied by other > disabilities. > For example, my son has Down Syndrome, autism, a moderate > hearing loss and > probably photo-sensitive epilepsy. He also has no depth > perception and > requires glasses to read. > > All I'm really saying is - consider the possibility of more than one > disability. Easier said than done I know - since I don't know how to > program for that either. > > It's nice to finally talk to you all and thank you for the significant > effort you are all putting in to helping people like my son. > > Lee Otto > > Lee Otto > ASPECT > Ph: (02) 6245 8133 > Fax: (02) 6247 7620 > > > > > > ************************************************************** > ********** > MIMEsweeper has been used to check this email for security > ************************************************************** > ********** > >
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2002 19:20:20 UTC