- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 10:04:46 -0800
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, Geoff Deering <gdeering@acslink.net.au>
- Cc: WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 5:29 AM -0500 1/21/02, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >Here is a statement of personal opinion: you should be aiming for at least >double-A conformance to WCAG, as the lowest level to provide something >aproaching equal access for everyone. (I realise it isn't a perfect >statement, because the guidelines are not perfect. But for a defined target >it is as close as I can get in one sentence). My personal opinion: What you should aim for is less dependent on what (arbitrary) categories certain checkpoints were put into, and more dependent upon your content, your audience, and your ability to meet the requirements of various checkpoints. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain http://idyllmtn.com Web Accessibility Expert-for-hire http://kynn.com/resume January Web Accessibility eCourse http://kynn.com/+d201 Forthcoming: Teach Yourself CSS in 24 Hours
Received on Monday, 21 January 2002 13:54:57 UTC