- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:35:53 -0800
- To: <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 1:32 AM -0600 3/20/02, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: >I LIKE server side tuning for different combinations of the above. But >unless we have a very sophisticated means to ask, discuss, negotiate and >come up with the right combination of features ---- for all browsers (or >a vast majority ) then we need to have a default, cross disability >accessible version --- don’t we? Definitely, but keep in mind that those are no more likely to solve the problems of multiple disabilities than anything else. We need to be careful not to think that a single "accessible" version is a magic bullet. The problem of complex disability needs still exists no matter how many versions you have. Restricting yourself to one (as some would do) is less of a solution than adding 5 more to that one. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain http://idyllmtn.com Next Book: Teach Yourself CSS in 24 http://cssin24hours.com Kynn on Web Accessibility ->> http://kynn.com/+sitepoint
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 17:36:06 UTC