RE: Multiple versions of a page

• From: phoenixl <phoenixl@sonic.net>
• Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 12:46:00 -0800
• To: charles@w3.org, gian@stanleymilford.com.au
• Cc: Lee.Otto@aspect.com.au, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
• Message-Id: <200203162046.g2GKk0Dp026057@newbolt.sonic.net>

Hi,

I'm not sure I would agree with this analysis.  I think there are some
inherent groupings of functionality.  For example, in general, the
major group of people which is affected by tables for layout is
pretty much the same group affected by javascript.

Scott

> Hi,

> I think Lee is right, and one major problem with having multiple
> versions of a web page is that we can NEVER know the variety of
> disabilities a person may have, and therefore splitting an accessible
> web site into several sites can end up making that site essentially
> inaccessible. What I mean, is that if someone needs checkpoints A and B
> to access a site will not be able to do so if checkpoint A is solved by
> Site Version 1, and checkpoint B by Site Version 3.

> Cheers,
> Gian

Received on Saturday, 16 March 2002 15:47:00 UTC