- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 18:32:40 -0500
- To: Peter <peter@petermoulding.com> (by way of Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>), w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Vischeck is a tool that can show a web page as seen by 3 different types of color deficiency: http://www.vischeck.com/ --w At 09:44 AM 2/5/02, Peter wrote: >2/5/02 6:26:30 PM, jonathan chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com> wrote: > >>I imagine what is needed is a validator, so that users can 'see' what >>their page would look like. >> >>thanks >> >>-- >>j.chetwynd@btinternet.com >> >>http://www.peepo.com "enjoy surfing the net" >>http://www.learningdifficulty.org >> >> > >Hello Jonathan, >What I envisage are pages where people with known colour discrimination problems can look at colour samples and >report back on the result. They would identify the type of screen they use, crt, lcd, etc, and tick colour pairs that look >different but not those that look the same. Each result would add to the information displayed and Web site developers >could look to see the contrast required between colours. > >Each sample would display the HTML RGB parameter and any equivalent useful to image editors. People creating >HTML could look for colour differences with universal acceptance and those without. If the information is presented as >colour differentials, it could lead to a simple page where people type in their preferred colours and get the problem >combinations highlighted. If someone wants to then take the calculations from the script and place them in to a validator, >I could help. > >People creating images would get the general idea but creating an image validator would be difficult. Way beyond my >poor brain. Easier to just have examples of what works and what does not. > >Peter -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative seattle, wa usa /--
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 18:30:13 UTC