Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC

Charles,

Do you feel we need to address this fuzziness before publishing the document this Thursday?

--wendy

>  S1 - Serving content in different forms in order to meet different user
>  needs or preferences is an acceptable way to comply with the guidelines,
>  --  as long as equivalents for all of the information are provided in
>  the different forms, and it is all available from the same URI.
>  (Accessible, findable links to alternate form(s) is allowed.) (Server
>  side solutions are acceptable - as specified.)
>
>CMN This still seems unclear to me as a way of phrasing what we mean. Does it
>mean every version must be content-negotiated, to keep the URI the same (in
>parctice this doesn't work with existing systems, where a specific version
>can come from a generic, content-negotiated URI, or can come from a specific
>version URI), or does it mean that it must be possible (easy?) to get from
>one version to another by some means?
>
>I therefore propose that we mark this as an issue still open until we can
>produce (or the editors can propose) some wording that seems less fuzzy
>
>Charles McCN 

-- 
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium 
web accessibility initiative
seattle, wa usa
/--

Received on Monday, 28 January 2002 11:23:14 UTC