- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 08:37:33 -0500 (EST)
- To: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@sonic.net>
- cc: <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I basically agree, although I think that if using the paralell tree approach links across different trees are necessary, not just desirable. cheers Chaals On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Scott Luebking wrote: Hi, There seems to be two basic strategies for accessing different versions of a web page. One strategey has a way to track a user's preference by using cookies or including session information in the URL. The other strategy is to provide parallel tree structures. I think that both are reasonable depending of the development resources possible. For some places where the availability of programmers to hadle cookies or rewriting URL's is very limited, the parallel tree approach might be reasonable. It can also be useful for users who refuse cookies. For other sites where there is more programming resources available, using cookies or rewriting URL's might be fine. If the parallel tree approach is used, peoviding links to versions od the page in other trees would be desirable.
Received on Tuesday, 1 January 2002 08:37:36 UTC