- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:38:14 -0500
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, Jo Miller <jo@bendingline.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
In today's telecon we resolved to move forward with the following wording: S1- Serving content in different forms to meet different user needs and preferences is an acceptable way to comply with the guidelines, as long as the different forms - are complete (i.e., they provide equivalents for <em>all</em> the content), - are up to date, and - can be easily selected according to user preferences. Note: We will not make any assumptions about the method that is used, whether it be content negotiation or a link. At 01:26 PM 1/31/02, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >Yep, I like the way Jo has phrased this. Note that the question of the >difference between information and content is the subject of a glossary >discussion at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2002Jan/0002 and >following, especially because there are cases like this where the difference >is meaningful. > >chaals > >On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Jo Miller wrote: > > I agree with Charles and Gian on the content, though the wording is > still somewhat difficult. Can we use bullets in the Requirements > document? If so, a possible rewording might be something like the > following: > > S1- Serving content in different forms to meet different user needs > and preferences is an acceptable way to comply with the guidelines, > as long as the different forms > - are complete (i.e., they provide equivalents for <em>all</em> the > information [content?]), > - are up to date, and > - can be reached via accessible, easy-to-find links in the other > versions of the content. > > Edits welcome. > > Jo -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative seattle, wa usa /--
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2002 17:39:35 UTC