- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 18:14:13 -0500
- To: jonathan.odonnell@ngv.vic.gov.au, goliver@accease.com, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Jonathan, I agree that we ought to reuse the UAAG definition. This is how I've interpreted our use of the terms "normative" and "informative." --wendy >The User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 defines it >as: >"...that on which the requirements of this document >depend for their most precise statement." [5] >Can't we just point to that definition? > > >[5] http://www.w3.org/TR/UAAG10/glossary.html#def-normative -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative seattle, wa usa /--
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 18:11:54 UTC