- From: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 23:33:34 -0800
- To: "'GLWAI Guidelines WG (GL - WAI Guidelines WG)'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I agree that renderings should all have a level of conformance, but different level 3 conformance, is often done by different versions, which has advantages of being able to optimize renderings for conflicting user groups all the best, Lisa ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU> To: "'GLWAI Guidelines WG (GL - WAI Guidelines WG)'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:32 AM Subject: NEW Checkpoint 4.S.1 (taken from S-1. Goes in Section 4. ) > > NEW CHECKPOINT PROPOSAL > Based upon our discussions at the meeting yesterday > > > > Checkpoint 4.S.1 > If you are serving content in different forms to different users to > comply with the guidelines, then at least one version must meet all the > guidelines (with which compliance is asserted) and that form must be > complete and up to date: > > Success Criteria > > 1) that version provides accessible forms of all the content that is > provided in the default presentation > 2) that version can be obtained from visiting the same URI > 3) that version is always up to date (same content) as default > 4) that version can be easily selected by users using technologies > that area accessible under these guidelines (e.g. you don't have to > operate an inaccessible technology in order to request the accessible > form of the content) > > NOTE: The reason that one version must be used to meet all the > guidelines instead of using different versions to meet different > guidelines is to allow access by people having multiple disabilities -- > and because authors may not understand which combinations of guidelines > must be used together to provide access. > > > Gregg > > >
Received on Friday, 22 February 2002 01:37:25 UTC