- From: <gian@stanleymilford.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:45:15 +1100
- TO: charles@w3.org, phoenixl@sonic.net
- CC: Lee.Otto@aspect.com.au, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-Id: <H00000e0004064b0.1016595914.tux.sofcom.com.au@MHS>
I am sure there are some "reasonably obvious" groupings. Why aren't they documented anywhere? > -----Original Message----- > From: charles [mailto:charles@w3.org] > Sent: Tuesday, 19 March 2002 12:51 AM > To: phoenixl > Cc: Gian Sampson-Wild; Lee.Otto; w3c-wai-gl > Subject: RE: Multiple versions of a page > > > I am sure that there are a number of "reasonably obvious" > functionality > groupings. I assume that the first thing we will see is the > "reasonably > obvious" ones catered for, and later we will see more adaptive systems > designed to better provide for the needs of a wide range of people. > > There is old technology available to do this. The real > question in my mind is > how to make sure that people are getting a version they can > use, and then > how to make sure they can get the version that is best for > them to use. > > Cheers > > Charles McCN > > On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, phoenixl wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm not sure I would agree with this analysis. I think > there are some > inherent groupings of functionality. For example, in general, the > major group of people which is affected by tables for layout is > pretty much the same group affected by javascript. > > Scott > > > Hi, > > > I think Lee is right, and one major problem with having multiple > > versions of a web page is that we can NEVER know the variety of > > disabilities a person may have, and therefore splitting > an accessible > > web site into several sites can end up making that site > essentially > > inaccessible. What I mean, is that if someone needs > checkpoints A and B > > to access a site will not be able to do so if checkpoint > A is solved by > > Site Version 1, and checkpoint B by Site Version 3. > > > Cheers, > > Gian > > > -- > Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles > phone: +61 409 134 136 > W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI > fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22 > Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia > (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia > Antipolis Cedex, France) > > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2002 22:47:20 UTC