- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 18:10:45 -0500 (EST)
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
In the sense that something requires illustration to be accessible, the question of whether or not the illustrations are provided by the original author is irrelevant. In order to make something accessible, it may well be *required* to illustrate it, even if the original author lacked the desire, or resources, or time, or format to do so. In the sense that WCAG has no enforcement power, of course nothing is required. There are just things that need to be done *IF* somebody wants to make content accessible, according to the WCAG conformance definition. chaals On Sun, 31 Mar 2002, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: However, the point I was trying to make in my notes, is that it would not be *required* to illustrate previously published works that were not illustrated by the original author. --wendy
Received on Sunday, 31 March 2002 18:10:45 UTC