- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:35:56 -0500 (EST)
- To: <gian@stanleymilford.com.au>
- cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I agree with Gian. I think that the point could be shortened to read S1 - Serving content in different forms in order to meet different user needs or preferences is an acceptable way to comply with the guidelines, -- as long as equivalents for all of the information are provided in the different forms, it is up to date, and there is an accessible, findable link from each version to the others. without losing anything except the idea that all URIs must be the same (thisi is not how all such systems work in the real world, although there are single URIs that can be provided which offer the variations) chaals On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 gian@stanleymilford.com.au wrote: In terms of: S1 - Serving content in different forms in order to meet different user needs or preferences is an acceptable way to comply with the guidelines, -- as long as equivalents for all of the information are provided in the different forms, it is up to date, and the information is available from the same URI. Having an accessible, findable link from the URI to the alternate form is an acceptable approach. all I have to say is that Having an accessible, findable link from the URI to the alternate form is a necessity in order to comply with accessibility guidelines. Cheers, Gian
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2002 12:36:04 UTC