- From: Matt May <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 11:33:04 -0800
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>, "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com> > Keep in mind that not all users (e.g. library or educational users) > can upgrade their software, and that not all downloads are free; it > would take me several hours to download a new Netscape version from > home, and if I were in a country where I pay by the minute for > access, that would not be free at all. I'm aware of issues like this. Still, the line has to be drawn somewhere, as we're reminded constantly in going over these guidelines. I think it's perfectly reasonable to expect the vast majority of those who need a package to increase accessibility for them to either request it from their administrators or procure it otherwise. Holding back to accommodate browsers like Netscape 3, which is well under 1% in worldwide browser share, prevents full adoption of CSS, which in my opinion represents a much greater potential benefit. We can pick apart edge cases all we want, but I think the greater good here is crystal clear. - m
Received on Friday, 1 February 2002 14:33:39 UTC