- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:16:26 -0500 (EST)
- To: <gian@stanleymilford.com.au>
- cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, <wendy@w3.org>
So here we have a dilemma. There is a loss of presentation quality if text is rendered as images. There is a loss of presentation quality if people use Netscape, and the author "correctly" uses CSS to style the text. Do we have a mechanism for working out whether one of these is a bigger problem in terms of accessibility? chaals On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 gian@stanleymilford.com.au wrote: I would argue that due to Netscape and its ability (or inability) to display CSS as required, using text in an image would not violate When an appropriate markup language exists and is supported, use markup rather than raster-based images to convey information. simply because it is "not supported". Gian -----Original Message----- From: wendy [mailto:wendy@w3.org] Sent: Friday, 25 January 2002 7:43 AM To: charles; Gian Sampson-Wild Cc: w3c-wai-gl Subject: Re: text as images... Please note that the following appears in the errata for WCAG 1.0: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WAI-WEBCONTENT-ERRATA <quote> 8. Text in images - clarification of checkpoint 3.1. Added: 3 January 2001 Type: Clarification Refers to: Checkpoint 3.1 in 5 May 1999 version. Description (and correction). Checkpoint 3.1 should be reworded to read, "When an appropriate markup language exists and is supported, use markup rather than raster-based images to convey information. [Priority 2] For example, when supported, use SVG to create graphics, MathML to mark up mathematical equations, and CSS for text-oriented special effects. Avoid where possible using raster-based images to represent text -- use text and style sheets. Raster-based formats such as .gif and .jpeg paint the text as a series of pixels. When magnified the text becomes distorted. The ability to magnify text is critical for user with low vision. You may use text in images when: the text does not convey its literal meaning but has a more graphical function, such as a logo and the effect can not be achieved with CSS and you have provided a text equivalent for the image. Refer also to Guideline 1, Guideline 6 and Guideline 11. </quote> Does this help any? --wendy
Received on Friday, 1 February 2002 13:16:29 UTC