- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:30:13 -0500 (EST)
- To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- cc: WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Just for the record I don't disagree with anything Kynn said... chaals On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Kynn Bartlett wrote: At 3:17 PM -0500 1/20/02, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >Having pictures of the text and the real text should meet the requirement >(having pictures and alt text does not) but technically fails the checkpoint, >and in my very personal opinion is ugly enough to be worth avoiding... Right, which is why it's a broken checkpoint. One thing we have to be careful of is that there are several types of "guidelines" which we may accidentally conflate together: * Those based on pure access to information * Those based on usability concerns * Those based on "style" etc
Received on Monday, 21 January 2002 12:30:16 UTC