[Bug 18221] the word 'using' is repeated in the last line following 'Shared Blacklists' (This information can then be shared with other sites, using using visitors' IP)
[Bug 18189] "The DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope interface must not exist ..." s/interface/interface object/ ?
[Bug 19114] New: (editorial) ""gopher" missing quote
[Bug 10894] [pending URL spec] Reflecting an IDL attribute with a URL should try to canonicalize whatever value is set
[Bug 15684] [URL] Replacing backslash with forward slash in URIs doesn't seem to be necessitated by web compat
[Bug 14210] Reflecting href with a URL that doesn't resolve doesn't return the empty string in browsers (at least opera/moz, don't know what URL would fail to resolve in webkit). Instead it returns the value without resolving.
[Bug 15718] Need to decide if URLs can ever fail to parse
[widgets] Packaged Web Apps (Widgets) - Packaging and XML Configuration (Second Edition) is a Proposed Edited Recommendation
[admin] Call for Editor for DOM4 REC track spec
Re: [XHR] chunked
[Bug 16299] editorial - inadequate description of upload attribute
CfC: publish LCWD of Pointer Lock; deadline Oct 4
Re: Feedback requested for UndoManager and DOM Transaction
[admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15
- Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15
- RE: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15
[admin] Call for Editor for XHR REC track doc
[Bug 19003] New: Bugs in toNativeLineEndings()
[Bug 18189] "The DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope interface must not exist ..." s/interface/interface object/ ?
[Bug 16733] Drop 'endings'?
In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?
- RE: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?
- Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?
- Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?
- RE: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?
- Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?
[xbl] "status of this document" section could use work
[WebSockets] Call for Implementations
UndoManager.item should probably return a sequence, not an IDL array object
Some issues with undo manager specification text
Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Sandboxed Filesystem use cases? (was Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?)
- Re: Sandboxed Filesystem use cases? (was Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?)
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
[Web-storage] subdomains / cooperation and limits
Re: Sandbox
[selectors-api] Kudos on find/findAll, feedback on spec readability
sandbox
[Bug 18275] equivanet -> equivalent
[Bug 18001] Allow data: URL for new Worker(). Supported by Opera and Firefox.
[Bug 18003] Change use of "relevant namespace object" term re workers
localStorage
[Bug 18275] equivanet -> equivalent
[Bug 18003] Change use of "relevant namespace object" term re workers
[Bug 18001] Allow data: URL for new Worker(). Supported by Opera and Firefox.
[Bug 18001] Allow data: URL for new Worker(). Supported by Opera and Firefox.
[Bug 18003] Change use of "relevant namespace object" term re workers
[Bug 18866] New: Make it clear that localStorage can be cleared by UA at will
[Bug 18852] New: FileList says it's a Collection but that doesn't make sense
[XHR]
[quota-api] API change suggestions
[quota-api] Need for session storage type
[XHR] Event processing during synchronous request
- Re: [XHR] Event processing during synchronous request
- Re: [XHR] Event processing during synchronous request
[FileAPI] Blob constructor should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array object
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob constructor should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array object
[Bug 18809] New: Some examples in the index section (3.3.4) have errors
[Bug 18275] equivanet -> equivalent
Call for Review of Content Security Policy 1.0
Proposal to add USB keycodes to the current DOM3 key events
- Re: Proposal to add USB keycodes to the current DOM3 key events
- RE: Proposal to add USB keycodes to the current DOM3 key events
[Bug 18275] equivanet -> equivalent
Scrolling when document.documentElement requests fullscreen
Survey on Community and Business Group Experience [reminder]
[Bug 18796] New: HTTP 204 not specified
[EventSource] Feedback Comments
Social Networking and Elections
Standards for Web applications on mobile devices: August 2012 updates
[XHR] Setting the User-Agent header
- Re: [XHR] Setting the User-Agent header
- Re: [XHR] Setting the User-Agent header
- Re: [XHR] Setting the User-Agent header
IndexedDB API Doc Correction
[Bug 18772] New: Should getAllResponseHeaders() end with \r\n?
CfC: publish FPWD of DOM Parsing and Serialization; deadline Sept 11
Sync API for workers
[Bug 18509] I find typo. in 4 The WebSocket interface attribute EventHandleronopen; -> attribute EventHandler onopen;
CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of WebSocket API; deadline September 7
[Bug 18749] New: Why removing exception throwing from binaryType
- [Bug 18749] Why removing exception throwing from binaryType
- [Bug 18749] Why removing exception throwing from binaryType
- [Bug 18749] Why removing exception throwing from binaryType
[CSSWG][selectors4] Updated WD of Selectors Level 4
Editor's draft created of DOM Parsing and Serialization Spec
- Re: Editor's draft created of DOM Parsing and Serialization Spec
- Re: Editor's draft created of DOM Parsing and Serialization Spec
- Re: Editor's draft created of DOM Parsing and Serialization Spec
- Re: Editor's draft created of DOM Parsing and Serialization Spec
Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
[WebIDL] A new way to define UnionTypes
TPAC f2f 29/30 oct: attendance / remote dial-in
[Bug 18289] Support 'column' here for consistency with window.onerror?
[Bug 18701] New: FileSystem/FileWriter API needs a method to flush/sync
[Bug 18509] I find typo. in 4 The WebSocket interface attribute EventHandleronopen; -> attribute EventHandler onopen;
[Bug 14376] Move to the new WebIDL exceptions
DOMTransactionEvent in UndoManager
[webcomponents] Packaging as the umbrella spec
CfC: publish LCWD of DOM 3 Events; deadline August 31
[Clipboard API] Add a flag to indicate paste-as-text to beforepaste and paste events
- Re: [Clipboard API] Add a flag to indicate paste-as-text to beforepaste and paste events
- Re: [Clipboard API] Add a flag to indicate paste-as-text to beforepaste and paste events
[Bug 18668] New: Maybe restore support for Blob(ArrayBuffer)
[Bug 18656] New: objectStore.delete should raise InvalidStateError if object store is deleted
[Bug 18653] New: wrong bug tracker link
Push API draft update
IndexedDB API: Missing exception
[Bug 18001] Allow data: URL for new Worker(). Supported by Opera and Firefox.
[Bug 18003] Change use of "relevant namespace object" term re workers
[Bug 18188] "relevant namespace object" is not defined in WebIDL anymore.
[Bug 18218] Within the workers text "list of active intervals" can be removed because it is the same as "list of active timers".
[Bug 18080] "This specification introduces two related mechanisms, similar to HTTP session cookies, for storing structured data on the client side." - structured data is no longer supported
[Bug 15994] origin attribute
[Bug 18033] each MessageChannel acts as its own task source. This means that messages sent using this function are not guaranteed to execute in order, since the order task sources are processed isn't specified.
[Bug 18045] Based on my experience and from reading many questions on the Web, this API is seriously flawed. It treats cross-domain iframes the same as same-domain iframes, except that almost every operation on contentWindow is an error.
[Bug 18242] Not clear what "script that invoked the method" means exactly. Should this be changed to "entry script" instead? If not, please specify what it means.
Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- RE: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 28
- Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 28
- Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 28
- Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 28
[UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
- Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes
[Bug 18221] the word 'using' is repeated in the last line following 'Shared Blacklists' (This information can then be shared with other sites, using using visitors' IP)
[Bug 10896] enable device independent access to event handlers
[Bug 10896] enable device independent access to event handlers
[Bug 18623] New: Editorial issues: Clarify CLOSING, capitalize websocket, add anchor to reason attribute
[Bug 18611] New: Blob should support Transferable
[Bug 18610] New: Transferable should expose a close() method
[Bug 16952] Add a Blob.close()
[webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla
- Re: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla
- Re: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla
- Re: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla
[WEBIDL] nullable dictionary members
FileSystem API: Cross origin sharing
[Bug 18558] New: [IndexedDB] Define error seen when key generator maximum value is reached
[webcomponents] Progress Update
[Bug 18551] New: [IndexedDB] Ambiguity about operations preceding a failed createIndex.
Acceptable for CSS to add a "window.CSS" global?
- Re: Acceptable for CSS to add a "window.CSS" global?
- Re: Acceptable for CSS to add a "window.CSS" global?
- Re: Acceptable for CSS to add a "window.CSS" global?
IndexedDB: ambiguity around createIndex order-of-operations
[Bug 18548] New: Add a Content-Length header to Blob URI request-response semantics
[FileAPI] blob: protocol need a content-length header
Web Components Suggestion
working on a project that might be of interest - p2p collaboration webapp
Drag & Drop Web Apps
[Bug 18529] New: Existence of separators in token should throw SyntaxError
[Bug 18528] New: Spec is unclear about the case sensitivity of parameter values
[Bug 18523] New: Spec is unclear about the restriction on LWS in the attribute/value in the ABNF for media-type
[Bug 18521] New: Spec is unclear about lower-casing content types
- [Bug 18521] Spec is unclear about lower-casing content types
- [Bug 18521] Spec is unclear about lower-casing content types
RfC: LCWD of WebSocket API; deadline August 30
- Re: RfC: LCWD of WebSocket API; deadline August 30
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of WebSocket API; deadline August 30
[IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB
- Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB
introduce myself, takano from ACCESS
Automatic DOM transactions in UndoManager
Automatic DOM transactions in UndoManager
[Bug 18502] New: [IndexedDB] Editorial: Wording around IDBFactory.open() with no version misleading
[WEBIDL] nullable dictionary
Widget access request policy
Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad)
- Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad)
- Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad)
- Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad)
Drawing Tablets
IndexedDB and RegEx search
Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
- Re: Lazy Blob
allowfullscreen vs sandbox="allow-fullscreen", and mimicking for pointer lock
- Re: allowfullscreen vs sandbox="allow-fullscreen", and mimicking for pointer lock
- Re: [whatwg] allowfullscreen vs sandbox="allow-fullscreen", and mimicking for pointer lock
F2F meeting Oct 29-30 in Lyon France; registration deadline Oct 16
CORS spec error (?)
CfC: publish LCWD of WebSocket API; deadline August 6
[Bug 18427] New: [IndexedDB] Spec text requires index names be unique within database
[Bug 10213] [URL] The definition of "absolute url" makes https:foo not an absolute url, since its behavior depends on whether the base is https: or not. Is that desired? In particular, using this definition for websockets means that wss: urls with no forward...
[gamepad] Polling access point
Re: Web Activities: counter-proposal to Web Intents
[Bug 17263] Keep on having send(ArrayBuffer data) interface in addition to send(ArrayBufferView data)
[websockets] ArrayBuffer added back to the ED
[Bug 17073] Formatting Binary Data
[Bug 16025] Re: Web Storage Editor's Draft 28 November 2011 "The use of the storage mutex to avoid race conditions is currently considered by certain implementors to be too high a performance burden, to the point where allowing data corruption is considered preferabl
[Bug 14900] note about checking "origin" attribute of MessageEvent
[widgets] Request to publish is P&C as Proposed Edited Recommendation
- Re: [widgets] Request to publish is P&C as Proposed Edited Recommendation
- CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8
- Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8
- Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8
- Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8
- Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8
- Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8
- Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8
- [widgets] P&C ready for pub - Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8
- Re: [widgets] P&C ready for pub - Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8
- Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8
- Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8
- Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8
- Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8
- Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8
- CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8
[IndexedDB] The sync API
[IndexedDB] blocked event could be an error
- Re: [IndexedDB] blocked event could be an error
[webcomponents] Progress Update
[selectors-api] RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19
- Re: [selectors-api] RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19
[Bug 16927] HTML reference was changed from W3C version to WHATWG version
[Bug 18329] New: [IndexedDB] [supertrivial] Use more understandable example for indeces
[Bug 18328] New: [IndexedDB] Editorial: Clarify that "record value" === "referenced primary key" for indeces
[Bug 18320] New: Clarify how reconnection works when loosing internet connection
Making <template> play nice with XML and tags-and-text
- Re: Making <template> play nice with XML and tags-and-text
- Re: Making <template> play nice with XML and tags-and-text
[Bug 17974] New: appcache: Add an API to make appcache support caching specific URLs dynamically
Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
- Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS?
Re: [Workers] Worker same-origin and usage in JS libraries...
[Server-sent Events] Status of 26-April-2012 LC comments
Re: CORS security hole?
[Bug 17303] Fix editorial issues from Tobie
[Bug 17253] [IndexedDB] IDL typo
[Bug 17198] Remove mention of IDBVersionChangeRequest
[Bug 16467] [IndexedDB] [editorial] remove spurious IDBVersionChangeRequest-sentence
[Bug 16441] Spec should note that onsuccess shouldn’t be used for writes.
CORS security hole
[Bug 17786] New: hello, i am just testing websocket, thank you.
[Bug 17032] IndexedDB: Editorial - use of phrase "explicit key" is confusing
[Bug 17657] Empty arrays shouldn't be valid KeyPaths
[Bug 17276] Step 8 in versionchange transaction algorithm is wrong.
[Bug 17538] [IndexedDB] Remove error clauses for invalid index keys
[Bug 17643] What should transaction.error be set to if a error handler throws an exception
[Bug 17236] Ambiguity in IDBTransaction.error around 'done' state
[Bug 17609] [IndexedDB] Events fired after transaction abort should not set active flag
[Bug 17650] Make createIndex throw InvalidAccessError instead of NotSupportedError
[Bug 17772] New: [URL] The definition of "absolute url" makes https:foo not an absolute url, since its behavior depends on whether the base is https: or not. Is that desired? In particular, using this definition for websockets means that wss: urls with no forward...
[Bug 17765] New: APIs need to take a reference to blob data underlying object URLs
[Bug 17762] New: lastModifiedDate should not be nullable
Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19
[Bug 17758] New: Consider using microtasks for autorevoke
[Bug 17757] New: Editorial: Add a note about why Blobs aren't Transferable
Re: DOMParser Errors Should Be Exceptions
Re: [File API] Blob URI creation
[Bug 17746] New: Specify Blob snapshots more robustly
Re: [File API] File behavior under modification
- Re: [File API] File behavior under modification
- Re: [File API] File behavior under modification
- Re: [File API] File behavior under modification
RfC: Content Security Policy 1.0 Last Call; deadline Aug 24
CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18
- Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18
- Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18
- Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18
- Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18
[Bug 17263] Keep on having send(ArrayBuffer data) interface in addition to send(ArrayBufferView data)
[Bug 16927] HTML reference was changed from W3C version to WHATWG version
[Bug 17224] Possible typo in section 6: Ping and Pong Frames
[Bug 17262] send function should have async interface
[Bug 16927] HTML reference was changed from W3C version to WHATWG version
[Bug 16730] Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
[Bug 15719] Under section "Disk Space", there seems to be a word missing in the sentence (see part in parens): "User agents should guard against sites storing data (under the origins other affiliated sites)" Should it have said "under the origins _of_ other affiliate
[Bug 13686] Add example of calling start() on a port
[Bug 16866] EOF is no longer valid as newline so "and the end of the file being the four ways in which a line can end" should be removed.
Re: [Server-Sent Events] Network connection clarification
- Re: [Server-Sent Events] Network connection clarification
[Bug 17736] New: Get "dereference" Blob URI terminology more in keeping with HTML5
[Bug 17734] New: please provide how to connect the url and how retrieve the json web service please prove one sample code ,my mail id is rajasekhar@sipl.co.in
[Bug 17733] New: please provide how to connect the url and how retrieve the json web service please prove one sample code ,my mail id is rajasekhar@sipl.co.in
[Bug 17732] New: please provide how to connect the url and how retrieve the json web service please prove one sample code ,my mail id is rajasekhar@sipl.co.in
Firefox 16 will ship unprefixed IndexedDB
Trialing Web Components
[XHR] What referrer to use when making requests
- Re: [XHR] What referrer to use when making requests
[Bug 17702] New: [IndexedDB editorial] IDBIndex.getKey should tell what it's doing
[UndoManager] What should a "native" automatic transaction expose?
[UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?
- Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface?