- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:44:15 +0200
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
On 2012-07-11 15:11, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Yesterday Hixie closed several of the Web Sockets bugs mentioned in the > e-mail below and he updated others. I think this now provides a basis to > determine if we have consensus to publish a Candidate Recommendation. As > such, this is a Call for Consensus to publish a Candidate Recommendation > of Web Sockets. > > I propose the CR be based on the May 24 LC [1] plus include: > > 1. The editorial patch for 17224 [2] > > 2. The patch [3] to remove the TreatNonCallableAsNull qualifier for some > attributes. If anyone considers this change as substantive, please speak > up. Cameron - what's your opinion on this? > > Additionally: > > * 12510 - as Hixie indicated in the bug, if anyone is willing to create > a patch, please contact Hixie privately and please let me know of your > intent > ... I'll re-state that the current spec is under defined, and should not be published. As far as I can tell, the W3C team will have to tune some parts of the spec anyway, so why not also insert the missing links? (If the answer to that is: "too much work" then why do you consider that it's not a problem for the *audience* of the spec?) Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2012 13:45:10 UTC