- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 14:34:23 +0200
- To: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Aug 2, 2012, at 14:51 , Tobie Langel wrote: > On 8/2/12 2:29 PM, "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com> wrote: >> On Aug 2, 2012, at 10:45 , Tobie Langel wrote: >>> On 8/1/12 10:04 PM, "Glenn Maynard" <glenn@zewt.org> wrote: >>>> Can we please stop saying "lazy blob"? It's a confused and confusing >>>> phrase. Blobs are "lazy" by design. >>> >>> Yes. "Remote blob" is more accurate and should help think about this >>> problem in a more meaningful way. >> >> Actually, you need both to be accurate. With the current stack you can >> have lazy blobs, and you can have remote blobs, but you can't have both >> at the same time. If we're going to be strict about naming this, we're >> talking about remote lazy blobs. > > What's a "remote blob" in the current stack? Setting responseType to blob on an XHR request. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 12:34:48 UTC