- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:59:25 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>, Rafael Weinstein <rafaelw@chromium.org>
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Adam Barth wrote: > > Yeah, that could work. We also need to consider nested templates: > > <template> > <div> > <template> > <span> > > I suspect we'll want the <span> to be in the same "inert" namespace as > the <div>, not doubly inerted. Definitely agreed on span and div; what's the use case for the inner <template> not being inert in this case, though? Surely it's fine for it to be inert; you'd instantiate its template from the instantiated outer template, right? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 17:59:51 UTC