W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: [FileAPI] blob: protocol need a content-length header

From: Benjamin BERNARD <benjamin.bernard@benvii.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 23:41:49 +0200
Message-ID: <5028231D.4030901@benvii.com>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
CC: public-webapps@w3.org
I build de demo script (for firefox) here : 
You will also notice that the player's load event isn't called.

Content-Length should be added to firefox (maybe open a ticket on 
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/) but it should also be recommended in the 
section "11.7.3. Request and Response Headers" of the spec.

Thanks for responding.

Benjamin BERNARD

Le 12/08/2012 21:23, Jonas Sicking a écrit :
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Benjamin BERNARD
> <benjamin.bernard@benvii.com>  wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I was developing an offline music web App when I discover that is no
>> "Content-length" header specified here :
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/FileAPI/#ProtocolExamples
>> So when you play an audio/video file stored as a blob (under a blob URI)
>> it's considered by the player as streaming content which means you can't get
>> the duration of a song for instance (it has an infinite duration). I think
>> it might be the consequence of not providing a content-length header.
>> I experienced it using Firefox I heard Internet Explorer already provide
>> this header.
>> Moreover, I don't understand why there is no content-length header
>> recommended in the spec because when you use URL.createObjectURL(blob), blob
>> has a finished size (correct me if I'm wrong). So a content-length header
>> should also be provided and recommended in the spec.
> Yes, I agree, we should have a content-length header similar to the
> content-type header.
> In Gecko things are a bit complicated because we don't have headers on
> anything but http channels. But we do have the concept of a length of
> a response for all channels so that should take care of it. Not sure
> off the top of my head why it doesn't. Filing a bug with an example
> would be great.
> / Jonas
Received on Sunday, 12 August 2012 21:42:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:38 UTC