W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Lazy Blob

From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 12:51:39 +0000
To: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CC4043D6.1125A%tobie@fb.com>
On 8/2/12 2:29 PM, "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com> wrote:

>On Aug 2, 2012, at 10:45 , Tobie Langel wrote:
>> On 8/1/12 10:04 PM, "Glenn Maynard" <glenn@zewt.org> wrote:
>>> Can we please stop saying "lazy blob"?  It's a confused and confusing
>>> phrase.  Blobs are "lazy" by design.
>> Yes. "Remote blob" is more accurate and should help think about this
>> problem in a more meaningful way.
>Actually, you need both to be accurate. With the current stack you can
>have lazy blobs, and you can have remote blobs, but you can't have both
>at the same time. If we're going to be strict about naming this, we're
>talking about remote lazy blobs.

What's a "remote blob" in the current stack?

Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 12:52:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:37 UTC