Re: Sync API for workers

On 09/01/2012 11:38 PM, Rick Waldron wrote:

> So far, they all look async. Just calling them "sync" doesn't make them "sync".

Sure they are sync. They are sync inside worker. We all know that we must not introduce
new sync APIs in the main thread.

Received on Saturday, 1 September 2012 21:12:42 UTC