On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: >> >>> So? Why should lazy blob be specific to HTTP specific semantics when an >>> arbitrary URL is not specific to HTTP? >>> >> >> So if you want to have a lazy reader on Websockets you have either: >> 1) respecify the websocket protocol to include content semantics for >> accessing resources defined by an URL and having a specified size OR >> 2) define an additional protocol on top of websockets, which websockets >> know nothing about, that allows a custom implementation at the server side >> to respond in a meaningful fashion to resource range requests. >> > > OR define a mechanism for LazyBlob that permits the injection of app > specific code into the underlying LazyBlob reader loop. > Further, a default behavior in the absence of such an injection might be defined simply to read data from the WS and stuff into the blob.
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 19:50:48 UTC