- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:54:51 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
On Aug 27, 2012, at 2:07 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I have mixed feelings about this proposal overall, but I think it's a little weird to use CSS property syntax instead of markup-like attribute syntax to set attributes. I think this makes the syntax confusingly similar to CSS even though proposed behavior is quite different. Something like this might make more sense: >> >> img.placeholder { >> src="/images/1x1.gif" >> alt="" >> } >> >> In other words, make attribute setting look like attribute syntax. > > This is similar to the discussions about monocle-mustache in JS. I > prefer being able to simple re-use the existing CSS parser, but I'm > not completely wedded to it. I'd need some strong opinions from more > relevant parties to switch over, though. I doubt we would be able to actually reuse the CSS parser, at least at the code level, at least for WebKit. To give some examples of issues that arise: - The CSS parser has specific knowledge of all the CSS properties we recognize and their value syntax. - It has no provision for catchall recognition of all other property names with a quoted string value. - There are some CSS properties that have the same name as meaningful HTML attributes. > >> And finally, I'm skeptical whether the convenience here is worth adding a whole new language to the Web Platform technology stack. It is literally just convenience / syntactic sugar. I'm not sure that rises to the high bar needed to add an additional language to the Web Platform. > > Yeah, this is the major hurdle for this. My hope is that, by reusing > the CSS parser and restricting all the expensive parts of CSS > (dynamicness, remembering where a value came from, etc.), I can pull > the bar down low enough for this to make it. I think your assumption is that it's possible to reuse the CSS parser is incorrect, at least for strong values of "reuse". Regards, Maciej
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2012 19:56:45 UTC