- From: Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:02:54 +0200
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 10:45:03 +0200, Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com> wrote: > On 8/1/12 10:04 PM, "Glenn Maynard" <glenn@zewt.org> wrote: > >> Can we please stop saying "lazy blob"? It's a confused and confusing >> phrase. Blobs are "lazy" by design. > Yes. "Remote blob" is more accurate and should help think about this > problem in a more meaningful way. Good name, makes it easier to understand why it best applies to transports that represent their resource with a URL pointing directly at it. All this talk about lazy blob was at least confusing me. :-) -- Odin Hørthe Omdal (Velmont/odinho) · Core, Opera Software, http://opera.com
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 09:03:29 UTC