- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:19:29 -0700
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
The CSSWG would like to add a new top-level object called "CSS" that we can hang several functions and constructors off of, so that we can avoid the excessive verbosity that's probably required if we just put everything on window. (Right now, the only thing we want to add is a "supports()" function, which is the API version of the upcoming @supports rule. In the future, we'd like to add things like the CSSOM Value API constructors to it, so authors can do a simple "new CSS.px(5)" rather than "new CSSPixelComponentValue(5)".) Does anyone see any problems with this? Do we think there's a significant compat risk to claiming an all-caps "CSS" variable? ~TJ
Received on Monday, 13 August 2012 18:20:16 UTC