Re: Lazy Blob from Florian Bösch on 2012-08-06 (public-webapps@w3.org from July to September 2012)

From: Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 21:31:40 +0200
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <CAOK8ODjHcp8KEg+VOTdHjnG=RhfmTGOPw3LuXbV_SvqVVvpa0A@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:

> I'll leave the translation of "IM protocol" to "user facing use case" as
> homework for the reader. It is trivial. My intent is to show a use case
> where one would use a persistent connection and a series of send/response
> messages that easily maps to WS. Instant Messaging is such a use case.
>
What is it exactly that requires you to use a remote blob with type blob in
the browser over a WS you cannot achieve with a WS and array buffers?

Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 19:32:08 UTC