public-webapps@w3.org from July to September 2012 by date

Saturday, 29 September 2012

• Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Rick Waldron
• RE: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Travis Leithead

Friday, 28 September 2012

• Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Rick Waldron
• Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Cameron McCormack
• RE: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Travis Leithead
• [Bug 18221] the word 'using' is repeated in the last line following 'Shared Blacklists' (This information can then be shared with other sites, using using visitors' IP) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18189] "The DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope interface must not exist ..." s/interface/interface object/ ? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Boris Zbarsky
• RE: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Travis Leithead
• Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Boris Zbarsky
• [Bug 19114] (editorial) ""gopher" missing quote bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19114] New: (editorial) ""gopher" missing quote bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10894] [pending URL spec] Reflecting an IDL attribute with a URL should try to canonicalize whatever value is set bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17772] [URL] The definition of "absolute url" makes https:foo not an absolute url, since its behavior depends on whether the base is https: or not. Is that desired? In particular, using this definition for websockets means that wss: urls with no forward... bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 15684] [URL] Replacing backslash with forward slash in URIs doesn't seem to be necessitated by web compat bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14210] Reflecting href with a URL that doesn't resolve doesn't return the empty string in browsers (at least opera/moz, don't know what URL would fail to resolve in webkit). Instead it returns the value without resolving. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 15718] Need to decide if URLs can ever fail to parse bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [widgets] Packaged Web Apps (Widgets) - Packaging and XML Configuration (Second Edition) is a Proposed Edited Recommendation Tobie Langel
• Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Cameron McCormack
• Re: [widgets] Packaged Web Apps (Widgets) - Packaging and XML Configuration (Second Edition) is a Proposed Edited Recommendation Charles McCathie Nevile
• [Bug 18749] Why removing exception throwing from binaryType bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [admin] Call for Editor for DOM4 REC track spec Glenn Adams

Thursday, 27 September 2012

• Re: [XHR] chunked Wenbo Zhu
• Re: [widgets] Packaged Web Apps (Widgets) - Packaging and XML Configuration (Second Edition) is a Proposed Edited Recommendation Tobie Langel
• [widgets] Packaged Web Apps (Widgets) - Packaging and XML Configuration (Second Edition) is a Proposed Edited Recommendation Arthur Barstow
• RE: [XHR] chunked Travis Leithead
• [admin] Call for Editor for DOM4 REC track spec Arthur Barstow
• Re: [XHR] chunked Anne van Kesteren
• RE: [XHR] chunked Travis Leithead
• Re: [XHR] chunked Anne van Kesteren
• RE: [XHR] chunked Travis Leithead
• Re: [XHR] chunked Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] blocked event could be an error Jonas Sicking
• Re: [XHR] chunked Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] chunked Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] blocked event could be an error João Eiras
• Re: [XHR] chunked Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 16299] editorial - inadequate description of upload attribute bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• CfC: publish LCWD of Pointer Lock; deadline Oct 4 Arthur Barstow
• Re: Feedback requested for UndoManager and DOM Transaction Aryeh Gregor
• RE: [push-api] Moving Push API to FPWD [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15] EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA
• RE: [push-api] Moving Push API to FPWD [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15] SULLIVAN, BRYAN L

Wednesday, 26 September 2012

• Re: Sandboxed Filesystem use cases? (was Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?) Eric U
• Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15] Vincent Scheib
• [push-api] Moving Push API to FPWD [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15] Arthur Barstow
• RE: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15 SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
• [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15] Arthur Barstow
• Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15 Vincent Scheib
• [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15 Arthur Barstow

Tuesday, 25 September 2012

• [admin] Call for Editor for XHR REC track doc Arthur Barstow
• RE: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Glenn Maynard
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Glenn Maynard
• Sandboxed Filesystem use cases? (was Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? James Graham
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Brendan Eich
• [Bug 19003] New: Bugs in toNativeLineEndings() bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Proposal to add USB keycodes to the current DOM3 key events Кошмарчик

Monday, 24 September 2012

• [Bug 18189] "The DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope interface must not exist ..." s/interface/interface object/ ? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• RE: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Travis Leithead
• [Bug 16733] Drop 'endings'? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Kinuko Yasuda

Sunday, 23 September 2012

• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Brendan Eich
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Maciej Stachowiak

Saturday, 22 September 2012

• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Maciej Stachowiak

Friday, 21 September 2012

• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Eric U
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Darin Fisher
• Re: Paths exposed in input type=file (was: Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?) Darin Fisher
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Darin Fisher
• Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Boris Zbarsky
• RE: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Travis Leithead
• In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [xbl] "status of this document" section could use work Arthur Barstow
• Paths exposed in input type=file (was: Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?) James Graham
• [xbl] "status of this document" section could use work Samuel Bronson

Thursday, 20 September 2012

• [WebSockets] Call for Implementations Arthur Barstow
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Darin Fisher
• UndoManager.item should probably return a sequence, not an IDL array object Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Some issues with undo manager specification text Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Some issues with undo manager specification text Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Adam Barth
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? James Graham

Wednesday, 19 September 2012

• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Adam Barth
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? James Graham
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Edward O'Connor
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Ian Hickson
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Darin Fisher
• Some issues with undo manager specification text Boris Zbarsky

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
• Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Robin Berjon
• Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track? Olli Pettay

Monday, 17 September 2012

• [Bug 18548] Add a Content-Length header to Blob URI request-response semantics bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Web-storage] subdomains / cooperation and limits Brian Kardell
• Re: CfC: publish FPWD of DOM Parsing and Serialization; deadline Sept 11 Ms2ger
• Re: CfC: publish FPWD of DOM Parsing and Serialization; deadline Sept 11 Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: Sandbox Florian Bösch
• List etiquette Re: Sandbox Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: Sandbox Joran Greef
• Re: Sandbox Florian Bösch
• Re: Sandbox Joran Greef

Sunday, 16 September 2012

• [selectors-api] Kudos on find/findAll, feedback on spec readability David Greenspan
• Re: CfC: publish FPWD of DOM Parsing and Serialization; deadline Sept 11 Ms2ger

Saturday, 15 September 2012

• Re: sandbox Adam Barth
• Re: sandbox Tab Atkins Jr.
• sandbox Angelo Borsotti
• [Bug 18275] equivanet -> equivalent bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 14 September 2012

• [Bug 18001] Allow data: URL for new Worker(). Supported by Opera and Firefox. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18003] Change use of "relevant namespace object" term re workers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Reminder: Mail List Etiquette [Was: Re: localStorage] Arthur Barstow

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

• localStorage Sean McHugh

Friday, 14 September 2012

• [Bug 18275] equivanet -> equivalent bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18003] Change use of "relevant namespace object" term re workers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18001] Allow data: URL for new Worker(). Supported by Opera and Firefox. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18001] Allow data: URL for new Worker(). Supported by Opera and Firefox. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18003] Change use of "relevant namespace object" term re workers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 13 September 2012

• Re: [FileAPI] Blob constructor should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array object Arun Ranganathan
• [Bug 18852] FileList says it's a Collection but that doesn't make sense bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [XHR] Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] Paul.Todd@sybase.com
• Re: Proposal to add USB keycodes to the current DOM3 key events Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: [XHR] Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Scrolling when document.documentElement requests fullscreen Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] What referrer to use when making requests Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Proposal to add USB keycodes to the current DOM3 key events Masayuki Nakano
• [Bug 18866] New: Make it clear that localStorage can be cleared by UA at will bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

• Re: [XHR] Event processing during synchronous request Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [XHR] What referrer to use when making requests Adam Barth
• Re: [XHR] Event processing during synchronous request Anne van Kesteren
• RE: [XHR] Event processing during synchronous request Mike Wilson
• Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser? Olli Pettay
• [Bug 18852] New: FileList says it's a Collection but that doesn't make sense bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [XHR] What referrer to use when making requests Jonas Sicking
• Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser? Olli Pettay
• Re: [XHR] What referrer to use when making requests Adam Barth
• Re: [XHR] What referrer to use when making requests Jonas Sicking

Tuesday, 11 September 2012

• Re: [quota-api] API change suggestions Tobie Langel
• [XHR] Paul.Todd@sybase.com
• Re: [quota-api] API change suggestions Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: [quota-api] API change suggestions Tobie Langel
• Re: [quota-api] API change suggestions Kinuko Yasuda
• Re: [quota-api] Need for session storage type Tobie Langel
• Re: [quota-api] API change suggestions Tobie Langel
• Re: [quota-api] API change suggestions Kinuko Yasuda
• Re: [quota-api] Need for session storage type Kinuko Yasuda
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob constructor should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array object Cameron McCormack

Monday, 10 September 2012

• Re: [FileAPI] Blob constructor should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array object Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob constructor should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array object Arun Ranganathan
• Re: Call for Review of Content Security Policy 1.0 Arthur Barstow
• Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser? Jonas Sicking
• [quota-api] API change suggestions Tobie Langel
• [quota-api] Need for session storage type Tobie Langel
• Re: [XHR] Event processing during synchronous request Anne van Kesteren
• RE: [XHR] Event processing during synchronous request Mike Wilson
• Re: [XHR] Event processing during synchronous request Anne van Kesteren

Sunday, 9 September 2012

• Re: [XHR] Event processing during synchronous request Olli Pettay
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob constructor should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array object Boris Zbarsky
• [XHR] Event processing during synchronous request Mike Wilson
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob constructor should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array object Glenn Maynard
• [FileAPI] Blob constructor should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array object Boris Zbarsky
• [Bug 18809] New: Some examples in the index section (3.3.4) have errors bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18275] equivanet -> equivalent bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 7 September 2012

• Re: Proposal to add USB keycodes to the current DOM3 key events Кошмарчик
• Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser? Adam Klein
• RE: Proposal to add USB keycodes to the current DOM3 key events Travis Leithead
• Re: Proposal to add USB keycodes to the current DOM3 key events Кошмарчик
• Call for Review of Content Security Policy 1.0 Hill, Brad
• Re: Sync API for workers Lon Ingram
• Re: Scrolling when document.documentElement requests fullscreen Simon Pieters

Thursday, 6 September 2012

• Proposal to add USB keycodes to the current DOM3 key events Кошмарчик

Friday, 7 September 2012

• [Bug 18275] equivanet -> equivalent bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Sync API for workers Glenn Maynard

Thursday, 6 September 2012

• Scrolling when document.documentElement requests fullscreen Chris Pearce
• Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser? Jonas Sicking
• Survey on Community and Business Group Experience [reminder] Coralie Mercier
• Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser? Adam Klein
• [Bug 18521] Spec is unclear about lower-casing content types bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18521] Spec is unclear about lower-casing content types bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18796] New: HTTP 204 not specified bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18668] Maybe restore support for Blob(ArrayBuffer) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [EventSource] Feedback Comments Arthur Barstow
• [EventSource] Feedback Comments Karl Dubost
• [Bug 17746] Specify Blob snapshots more robustly bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [XHR] Setting the User-Agent header Cameron Jones
• Re: [XHR] Setting the User-Agent header Tobie Langel
• Re: Sync API for workers Olli Pettay

Wednesday, 5 September 2012

• Re: [XHR] Setting the User-Agent header Robin Berjon

Thursday, 6 September 2012

• Re: Sync API for workers Jonas Sicking
• Re: Sync API for workers Olli Pettay
• Re: Sync API for workers Jonas Sicking
• Re: Sync API for workers Olli Pettay
• Re: Sync API for workers Olli Pettay
• Re: Sync API for workers Jonas Sicking
• Re: Sync API for workers Jonas Sicking
• Re: Sync API for workers Glenn Maynard
• Re: Sync API for workers Jonas Sicking
• Re: Sync API for workers Jonas Sicking

Wednesday, 5 September 2012

• Re: [IndexedDB] blocked event could be an error Jonas Sicking
• RE: Please don't SPAM our mail list [Was: Re: Social Networking and Elections] Adam Sobieski
• Re: [IndexedDB] blocked event could be an error Odin Hørthe Omdal
• Please don't SPAM our mail list [Was: Re: Social Networking and Elections] Arthur Barstow
• Social Networking and Elections Adam Sobieski
• Re: [XHR] Setting the User-Agent header Glenn Adams
• Standards for Web applications on mobile devices: August 2012 updates Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Sync API for workers Jonas Sicking
• Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser? Elliott Sprehn
• Re: [XHR] Setting the User-Agent header Rob Manson
• [XHR] Setting the User-Agent header Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 4 September 2012

• Re: Sync API for workers Lon Ingram
• IndexedDB API Doc Correction Jake Drew
• Re: Sync API for workers Alon Zakai
• Re: Sync API for workers Glenn Maynard
• Re: Sync API for workers Glenn Maynard
• Re: Sync API for workers Brendan Eich
• Re: Sync API for workers David Bruant
• Re: Sync API for workers David Bruant
• Re: Sync API for workers Ian Hickson
• Re: Sync API for workers Glenn Maynard
• Re: Sync API for workers David Bruant
• Re: Sync API for workers Glenn Maynard
• [Bug 18772] New: Should getAllResponseHeaders() end with \r\n? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Sync API for workers David Bruant
• CfC: publish FPWD of DOM Parsing and Serialization; deadline Sept 11 Arthur Barstow
• Re: Sync API for workers Glenn Maynard
• Re: Sync API for workers David Bruant
• Re: Sync API for workers Glenn Maynard
• Re: Sync API for workers Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Sync API for workers David Bruant
• Re: Sync API for workers Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Sync API for workers David Bruant
• Re: Sync API for workers Glenn Maynard
• Re: Sync API for workers Jonas Sicking

Monday, 3 September 2012

• Re: Sync API for workers Glenn Maynard
• Re: Sync API for workers Jonas Sicking
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Glenn Maynard
• Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Sync API for workers Andrew Wilson

Sunday, 2 September 2012

• Re: Sync API for workers Ian Hickson
• Re: Sync API for workers Glenn Maynard
• Re: Sync API for workers Andrew Wilson

Saturday, 1 September 2012

• Re: Sync API for workers Glenn Maynard
• Re: Sync API for workers Rick Waldron
• Re: Sync API for workers David Bruant
• Re: Sync API for workers Olli Pettay
• Re: Sync API for workers Rick Waldron
• Re: Sync API for workers Oliver Hunt
• Re: Sync API for workers Rick Waldron
• Re: Sync API for workers Rick Waldron
• Re: Sync API for workers Olli Pettay
• Re: Sync API for workers Rick Waldron
• Re: Sync API for workers Glenn Maynard
• Sync API for workers David Bruant

Friday, 31 August 2012

• RE: Editor's draft created of DOM Parsing and Serialization Spec Travis Leithead
• Re: Editor's draft created of DOM Parsing and Serialization Spec Arthur Barstow
• [Bug 18509] I find typo. in 4 The WebSocket interface attribute EventHandleronopen; -> attribute EventHandler onopen; bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of WebSocket API; deadline September 7 Arthur Barstow
• [Bug 18749] Why removing exception throwing from binaryType bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18749] Why removing exception throwing from binaryType bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18749] New: Why removing exception throwing from binaryType bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 30 August 2012

• [CSSWG][selectors4] Updated WD of Selectors Level 4 fantasai
• Re: Editor's draft created of DOM Parsing and Serialization Spec Edward O'Connor
• Re: Editor's draft created of DOM Parsing and Serialization Spec Ian Hickson
• Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser? Rafael Weinstein
• Re: change of affiliation Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: Editor's draft created of DOM Parsing and Serialization Spec Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser? Olli Pettay

Wednesday, 29 August 2012

• Editor's draft created of DOM Parsing and Serialization Spec Travis Leithead
• Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser? Ian Hickson
• [Bug 18623] Editorial issues: Clarify CLOSING, capitalize websocket, add anchor to reason attribute bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [WebIDL] A new way to define UnionTypes Adam Barth
• Re: [WebIDL] A new way to define UnionTypes Boris Zbarsky
• RE: [WebIDL] A new way to define UnionTypes Andrei Bucur
• Re: [WebIDL] A new way to define UnionTypes Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [WebIDL] A new way to define UnionTypes Adam Barth
• Re: [WebIDL] A new way to define UnionTypes Boris Zbarsky
• [WebIDL] A new way to define UnionTypes Andrei Bucur
• TPAC f2f 29/30 oct: attendance / remote dial-in Charles McCathie Nevile

Tuesday, 28 August 2012

• Re: Push API draft update Chaals McCathieNevile
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 28 Pavel Zubkou

Monday, 27 August 2012

• Re: Push API draft update SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• [Bug 18289] Support 'column' here for consistency with window.onerror? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18701] New: FileSystem/FileWriter API needs a method to flush/sync bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18509] I find typo. in 4 The WebSocket interface attribute EventHandleronopen; -> attribute EventHandler onopen; bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Saturday, 25 August 2012

• [Bug 14376] Move to the new WebIDL exceptions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 24 August 2012

• Re: DOMTransactionEvent in UndoManager Ojan Vafai
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: DOMTransactionEvent in UndoManager Ryosuke Niwa
• DOMTransactionEvent in UndoManager Sukolsak Sakshuwong
• [webcomponents] Packaging as the umbrella spec Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [Clipboard API] Add a flag to indicate paste-as-text to beforepaste and paste events Sebastian Markbåge
• Re: [Clipboard API] Add a flag to indicate paste-as-text to beforepaste and paste events Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: [Clipboard API] Add a flag to indicate paste-as-text to beforepaste and paste events Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Jonas Sicking

Thursday, 23 August 2012

• CfC: publish LCWD of DOM 3 Events; deadline August 31 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Glenn Maynard
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Ryosuke Niwa
• [Clipboard API] Add a flag to indicate paste-as-text to beforepaste and paste events Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Ryosuke Niwa
• [Bug 18668] New: Maybe restore support for Blob(ArrayBuffer) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Olli Pettay
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Olli Pettay
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Olli Pettay
• Reminder: RfC: LCWD of WebSocket API; deadline August 30 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Olli Pettay
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Glenn Maynard
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Ojan Vafai
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Glenn Maynard
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Maciej Stachowiak

Wednesday, 22 August 2012

• Re: IndexedDB API: Missing exception Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 18656] New: objectStore.delete should raise InvalidStateError if object store is deleted bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Acceptable for CSS to add a "window.CSS" global? Chaals McCathieNevile
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Bronislav Klučka
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Dimitri Glazkov
• [Bug 18653] New: wrong bug tracker link bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• Push API draft update EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Dimitri Glazkov

Tuesday, 21 August 2012

• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Lea Verou
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Glenn Maynard
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Brian Kardell
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Rick Waldron
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Lea Verou
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Brian Kardell
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Rick Waldron
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Brian Kardell
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Ojan Vafai
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• RE: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Travis Leithead
• Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 28 Scott Wilson
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Ojan Vafai
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Brian Kardell
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Brian Kardell
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• IndexedDB API: Missing exception Kristof Degrave
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Ojan Vafai
• [Bug 18001] Allow data: URL for new Worker(). Supported by Opera and Firefox. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18003] Change use of "relevant namespace object" term re workers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18188] "relevant namespace object" is not defined in WebIDL anymore. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18218] Within the workers text "list of active intervals" can be removed because it is the same as "list of active timers". bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18080] "This specification introduces two related mechanisms, similar to HTTP session cookies, for storing structured data on the client side." - structured data is no longer supported bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 15994] origin attribute bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18033] each MessageChannel acts as its own task source. This means that messages sent using this function are not guaranteed to execute in order, since the order task sources are processed isn't specified. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18045] Based on my experience and from reading many questions on the Web, this API is seriously flawed. It treats cross-domain iframes the same as same-domain iframes, except that almost every operation on contentWindow is an error. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18242] Not clear what "script that invoked the method" means exactly. Should this be changed to "entry script" instead? If not, please specify what it means. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Boris Zbarsky
• Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes! Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Adam Barth
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [admin] using Bugzilla's "component tracking feature"? [Was: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
• Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 28 Chaals McCathieNevile
• CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 28 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [admin] using Bugzilla's "component tracking feature"? [Was: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla Arthur Barstow
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Jonas Sicking
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Jonas Sicking
• [UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes Ryosuke Niwa

Monday, 20 August 2012

• Re: [admin] using Bugzilla's "component tracking feature"? [Was: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla Michael[tm] Smith
• [Bug 18221] the word 'using' is repeated in the last line following 'Shared Blacklists' (This information can then be shared with other sites, using using visitors' IP) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10896] enable device independent access to event handlers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10896] enable device independent access to event handlers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [widgets] P&C ready for pub - Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8 Chaals McCathieNevile
• [widgets] P&C ready for pub - Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8 Marcos Caceres
• Re: Widget access request policy Marcos Caceres
• Re: RfC: LCWD of WebSocket API; deadline August 30 Takeshi Yoshino
• [Bug 18623] New: Editorial issues: Clarify CLOSING, capitalize websocket, add anchor to reason attribute bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: RfC: LCWD of WebSocket API; deadline August 30 Arthur Barstow
• [admin] using Bugzilla's "component tracking feature"? [Was: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla Arthur Barstow

Sunday, 19 August 2012

• Re: Acceptable for CSS to add a "window.CSS" global? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Acceptable for CSS to add a "window.CSS" global? Chaals McCathieNevile
• Re: Acceptable for CSS to add a "window.CSS" global? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Acceptable for CSS to add a "window.CSS" global? Cameron McCormack

Friday, 17 August 2012

• [Bug 18611] Blob should support Transferable bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18611] New: Blob should support Transferable bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18610] New: Transferable should expose a close() method bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17736] Get "dereference" Blob URI terminology more in keeping with HTML5 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17762] lastModifiedDate should not be nullable bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17757] Editorial: Add a note about why Blobs aren't Transferable bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 16952] Add a Blob.close() bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• RE: [WEBIDL] nullable dictionary members Jungkee Song

Thursday, 16 August 2012

• Re: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla Chaals McCathieNevile
• Re: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
• Re: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla Brian Kardell
• [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [WEBIDL] nullable dictionary members Boris Zbarsky
• [WEBIDL] nullable dictionary members Jungkee Song

Wednesday, 15 August 2012

• Re: [IndexedDB] blocked event could be an error Odin Hørthe Omdal

Tuesday, 14 August 2012

• Re: FileSystem API: Cross origin sharing Glenn Maynard
• Re: [File API] Blob URI creation Glenn Maynard
• FileSystem API: Cross origin sharing Charles Pritchard
• RE: [File API] Blob URI creation Feras Moussa
• [Bug 18558] New: [IndexedDB] Define error seen when key generator maximum value is reached bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Acceptable for CSS to add a "window.CSS" global? Chaals McCathieNevile
• Re: Acceptable for CSS to add a "window.CSS" global? Odin Hørthe Omdal

Monday, 13 August 2012

• Re: Acceptable for CSS to add a "window.CSS" global? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Acceptable for CSS to add a "window.CSS" global? Ian Hickson
• Re: Drag & Drop Web Apps Ian Hickson
• [webcomponents] Progress Update Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: IndexedDB: ambiguity around createIndex order-of-operations Alec Flett
• [Bug 18551] New: [IndexedDB] Ambiguity about operations preceding a failed createIndex. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: IndexedDB: ambiguity around createIndex order-of-operations Jonas Sicking
• Re: Acceptable for CSS to add a "window.CSS" global? Dimitri Glazkov
• Acceptable for CSS to add a "window.CSS" global? Tab Atkins Jr.
• IndexedDB: ambiguity around createIndex order-of-operations Alec Flett
• Re: [FileAPI] blob: protocol need a content-length header Arun Ranganathan
• [Bug 18548] New: Add a Content-Length header to Blob URI request-response semantics bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Web Components Suggestion Brian Kardell
• Re: Web Components Suggestion Florian Bösch
• Re: Web Components Suggestion Chaals McCathieNevile
• Re: Web Components Suggestion Florian Bösch
• Re: Web Components Suggestion Michael[tm] Smith
• Re: Web Components Suggestion Michael[tm] Smith

Sunday, 12 August 2012

• Re: Web Components Suggestion Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [FileAPI] blob: protocol need a content-length header Benjamin BERNARD
• Re: [FileAPI] blob: protocol need a content-length header Jonas Sicking
• [FileAPI] blob: protocol need a content-length header Benjamin BERNARD
• Re: Web Components Suggestion Brian Kardell
• Re: Web Components Suggestion Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Web Components Suggestion Florian Bösch
• Web Components Suggestion Dave Geddes
• Re: Automatic DOM transactions in UndoManager Ryosuke Niwa

Saturday, 11 August 2012

• working on a project that might be of interest - p2p collaboration webapp Miles Fidelman

Friday, 10 August 2012

• Re: Drag & Drop Web Apps Charles Pritchard
• Drag & Drop Web Apps Joran Greef
• [Bug 18529] New: Existence of separators in token should throw SyntaxError bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18528] New: Spec is unclear about the case sensitivity of parameter values bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18523] New: Spec is unclear about the restriction on LWS in the attribute/value in the ABNF for media-type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Brendan Eich
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Glenn Maynard
• [Bug 18521] New: Spec is unclear about lower-casing content types bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Odin Hørthe Omdal
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Brendan Eich
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Aryeh Gregor
• Re: RfC: LCWD of WebSocket API; deadline August 30 Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Glenn Maynard
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB L. David Baron
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Cameron McCormack
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Cameron McCormack

Thursday, 9 August 2012

• Re: IndexedDB and RegEx search Alec Flett
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Aryeh Gregor
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Chaals McCathieNevile
• RfC: LCWD of WebSocket API; deadline August 30 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Odin Hørthe Omdal
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Robin Berjon
• Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8 Marcos Caceres
• Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8 Marcos Caceres
• Re: IndexedDB and RegEx search Robin Berjon
• Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8 Chaals McCathieNevile
• Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Glenn Maynard
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Ian Hickson
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Adam Barth
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Tab Atkins Jr.
• [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB Kyle Huey

Wednesday, 8 August 2012

• Re: IndexedDB and RegEx search Jonas Sicking

Friday, 3 August 2012

• introduce myself, takano from ACCESS Kazuki Takano/高野 一樹

Tuesday, 7 August 2012

• Automatic DOM transactions in UndoManager Sukolsak Sakshuwong
• Automatic DOM transactions in UndoManager Sukolsak Sakshuwong

Wednesday, 8 August 2012

• [Bug 18502] New: [IndexedDB] Editorial: Wording around IDBFactory.open() with no version misleading bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: IndexedDB and RegEx search Yuval Sadan
• Re: [WEBIDL] nullable dictionary Cameron McCormack
• Re: Making <template> play nice with XML and tags-and-text Elliott Sprehn
• [WEBIDL] nullable dictionary Jungkee Song
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Maynard
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• RE: Lazy Blob Jungkee Song

Tuesday, 7 August 2012

• Widget access request policy steve paesani
• [Bug 18320] Clarify how reconnection works after losing internet connectivity bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: IndexedDB and RegEx search Alec Flett
• Re: Lazy Blob Robin Berjon
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Maynard
• Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad) Florian Bösch
• Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad) Olli Pettay
• RE: Lazy Blob Jungkee Song
• Re: [selectors-api] RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19 Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [selectors-api] RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
• Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad) Glenn Maynard

Monday, 6 August 2012

• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Maynard
• Re: Making <template> play nice with XML and tags-and-text Jonas Sicking
• RE: Making <template> play nice with XML and tags-and-text Tony Ross
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Making <template> play nice with XML and tags-and-text Adam Barth
• Re: Lazy Blob Jonas Sicking
• Re: Lazy Blob Florian Bösch
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Maynard
• Re: Lazy Blob Florian Bösch
• Re: Lazy Blob Jonas Sicking
• RE: Making <template> play nice with XML and tags-and-text Tony Ross
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Ian Hickson
• RE: [selectors-api] RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19 Travis Leithead
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: [selectors-api] RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19 Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Lazy Blob Robin Berjon
• Re: Lazy Blob Robin Berjon
• Re: Lazy Blob Robin Berjon
• Re: IndexedDB and RegEx search Arthur Barstow
• Re: [selectors-api] RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [selectors-api] RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

Sunday, 5 August 2012

• Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element Henri Sivonen
• Re: Making <template> play nice with XML and tags-and-text Henri Sivonen

Saturday, 4 August 2012

• Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad) Florian Bösch
• Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad) Florian Bösch
• Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad) Florian Bösch
• Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad) Glenn Maynard
• Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad) Florian Bösch
• Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad) Florian Bösch
• Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad) Florian Bösch
• Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad) Olli Pettay
• Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad) Florian Bösch
• Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad) Florian Bösch
• Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad) Glenn Maynard

Friday, 3 August 2012

• Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad) Florian Bösch
• Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad) Glenn Maynard
• Re: Drawing Tablets Charles Pritchard
• Re: Drawing Tablets Florian Bösch
• Re: Drawing Tablets Charles Pritchard
• Re: Drawing Tablets Florian Bösch
• Re: Drawing Tablets Charles Pritchard
• Re: Drawing Tablets Florian Bösch
• Re: Drawing Tablets Charles Pritchard
• Re: Drawing Tablets Florian Bösch
• Re: Drawing Tablets Charles Pritchard
• Re: Lazy Blob Michael Nordman

Wednesday, 1 August 2012

• Re: Lazy Blob Florian Bösch

Thursday, 2 August 2012

• Re: Lazy Blob Florian Bösch

Wednesday, 1 August 2012

• Drawing Tablets Florian Bösch
• Re: Lazy Blob Florian Bösch
• Re: Lazy Blob Florian Bösch
• Re: Lazy Blob Florian Bösch
• Re: Lazy Blob Florian Bösch
• Drawing Tablets Florian Bösch

Thursday, 2 August 2012

• Re: Lazy Blob Florian Bösch
• Re: Lazy Blob Florian Bösch

Tuesday, 31 July 2012

• IndexedDB and RegEx search Michael Brooks

Wednesday, 1 August 2012

• Re: Lazy Blob Florian Bösch

Thursday, 2 August 2012

• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Maynard
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Ian Hickson
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Ian Hickson
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Ian Hickson
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Tobie Langel
• RE: Lazy Blob Jungkee Song
• Re: Lazy Blob Robin Berjon
• Re: Lazy Blob Odin Hørthe Omdal
• Re: Lazy Blob Tobie Langel
• Re: Lazy Blob Robin Berjon
• Re: Lazy Blob Robin Berjon
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Ian Hickson
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Jonas Sicking
• Re: Lazy Blob Ian Hickson
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Maynard
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Maynard
• Re: Lazy Blob Boris Zbarsky

Wednesday, 1 August 2012

• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Maynard
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Michael Nordman
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Charles Pritchard
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: [whatwg] allowfullscreen vs sandbox="allow-fullscreen", and mimicking for pointer lock Vincent Scheib
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Adams
• Re: Lazy Blob Glenn Maynard
• Lazy Blob Robin Berjon
• Re: [whatwg] allowfullscreen vs sandbox="allow-fullscreen", and mimicking for pointer lock Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg] allowfullscreen vs sandbox="allow-fullscreen", and mimicking for pointer lock Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg] allowfullscreen vs sandbox="allow-fullscreen", and mimicking for pointer lock Adam Barth
• Re: [whatwg] allowfullscreen vs sandbox="allow-fullscreen", and mimicking for pointer lock Robert O'Callahan

Tuesday, 31 July 2012

• Re: [whatwg] allowfullscreen vs sandbox="allow-fullscreen", and mimicking for pointer lock Adam Barth
• Re: [whatwg] allowfullscreen vs sandbox="allow-fullscreen", and mimicking for pointer lock Adam Barth
• Re: allowfullscreen vs sandbox="allow-fullscreen", and mimicking for pointer lock Vincent Scheib
• allowfullscreen vs sandbox="allow-fullscreen", and mimicking for pointer lock Vincent Scheib
• Re: [selectors-api] RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [gamepad] Polling access point Ted Mielczarek
• F2F meeting Oct 29-30 in Lyon France; registration deadline Oct 16 Arthur Barstow
• Re: CORS spec error (?) Anne van Kesteren

Monday, 30 July 2012

• CORS spec error (?) ewolfman@yahoo.com

Tuesday, 31 July 2012

• Fw: CORS spec error (?) ewolfman@yahoo.com

Monday, 30 July 2012

• CfC: publish LCWD of WebSocket API; deadline August 6 Arthur Barstow

Saturday, 28 July 2012

• Re: [websockets] ArrayBuffer added back to the ED Arthur Barstow

Friday, 27 July 2012

• [Bug 18427] New: [IndexedDB] Spec text requires index names be unique within database bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10213] [URL] The definition of "absolute url" makes https:foo not an absolute url, since its behavior depends on whether the base is https: or not. Is that desired? In particular, using this definition for websockets means that wss: urls with no forward... bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [gamepad] Polling access point Scott Graham
• Re: [gamepad] Polling access point Scott Graham
• Re: [gamepad] Polling access point Adam Barth

Thursday, 26 July 2012

• Re: [gamepad] Polling access point Scott Graham
• RE: [gamepad] Polling access point Travis Leithead
• [gamepad] Polling access point Scott Graham
• Re: [IndexedDB] blocked event could be an error Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] blocked event could be an error João Eiras
• Re: [IndexedDB] blocked event could be an error Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] blocked event could be an error David Grogan
• Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8 Chaals McCathieNevile
• Re: [websockets] ArrayBuffer added back to the ED Takashi Toyoshima
• Re: Web Activities: counter-proposal to Web Intents Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 25 July 2012

• [Bug 17263] Keep on having send(ArrayBuffer data) interface in addition to send(ArrayBufferView data) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8 Marcos Caceres
• Re: [websockets] ArrayBuffer added back to the ED Boris Zbarsky
• [websockets] ArrayBuffer added back to the ED Arthur Barstow
• Re: CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8 Chaals McCathieNevile
• CfC: publish Widgets P&C as a "Proposed Edited Recommendation"; deadline August 8 Arthur Barstow
• [Bug 17702] [IndexedDB editorial] IDBIndex.getKey should tell what it's doing bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17685] Hello, Please make the standard web socket api include a spec for an in browser "listener" socket. Meaning: a javascript application is able to create a server listener socket in the browser on the client. Another client can discover this ip (though most bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17073] Formatting Binary Data bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 16025] Re: Web Storage Editor's Draft 28 November 2011 "The use of the storage mutex to avoid race conditions is currently considered by certain implementors to be too high a performance burden, to the point where allowing data corruption is considered preferabl bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14900] note about checking "origin" attribute of MessageEvent bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 24 July 2012

• Re: [widgets] Request to publish is P&C as Proposed Edited Recommendation Marcos Caceres
• [widgets] Request to publish is P&C as Proposed Edited Recommendation Marcos Caceres
• Re: [webcomponents] Progress Update Rokesh Jankie
• Re: [IndexedDB] The sync API Odin Hørthe Omdal
• Re: [IndexedDB] The sync API Jonas Sicking

Monday, 23 July 2012

• [IndexedDB] The sync API Odin Hørthe Omdal
• [IndexedDB] blocked event could be an error Odin Hørthe Omdal
• [webcomponents] Progress Update Dimitri Glazkov

Saturday, 21 July 2012

• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Henry Story
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Eric Rescorla
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Henry Story
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Jonas Sicking

Friday, 20 July 2012

• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Ian Hickson
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Henry Story
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Henry Story
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Adam Barth
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Cameron Jones
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Adam Barth
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Cameron Jones
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Adam Barth
• [selectors-api] RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
• [Bug 16927] HTML reference was changed from W3C version to WHATWG version bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 19 July 2012

• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18 Julian Reschke
• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18 Arthur Barstow
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Cameron Jones
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Cameron Jones
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Cameron Jones
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Eric Rescorla
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Cameron Jones
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Henry Story
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Cameron Jones
• [Bug 18329] New: [IndexedDB] [supertrivial] Use more understandable example for indeces bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18328] New: [IndexedDB] Editorial: Clarify that "record value" === "referenced primary key" for indeces bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Server-Sent Events] Network connection clarification Neil Jenkins

Wednesday, 18 July 2012

• [Bug 18320] New: Clarify how reconnection works when loosing internet connection bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Making <template> play nice with XML and tags-and-text Adam Barth
• Re: Making <template> play nice with XML and tags-and-text Adam Klein
• Re: Making <template> play nice with XML and tags-and-text Ian Hickson
• Re: Making <template> play nice with XML and tags-and-text Adam Barth
• Re: Making <template> play nice with XML and tags-and-text Ian Hickson
• Making <template> play nice with XML and tags-and-text Adam Barth
• [Bug 17974] New: appcache: Add an API to make appcache support caching specific URLs dynamically bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Henry Story
• Re: Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Ian Hickson
• Why the restriction on unauthenticated GET in CORS? Henry Story

Tuesday, 17 July 2012

• Re: [Workers] Worker same-origin and usage in JS libraries... Bronislav Klučka
• Re: [Workers] Worker same-origin and usage in JS libraries... Ian Hickson
• Re: [Workers] Worker same-origin and usage in JS libraries... Bronislav Klučka
• Re: CORS proxy - was: CORS security hole? Eric Rescorla
• Re: [Workers] Worker same-origin and usage in JS libraries... Ian Hickson
• Re: CORS proxy - was: CORS security hole? Henry Story
• Re: CORS proxy - was: CORS security hole? Eric Rescorla
• CORS proxy - was: CORS security hole? Henry Story
• Re: CORS security hole? Dirk Pranke
• Re: [Server-Sent Events] Network connection clarification Odin Hørthe Omdal
• [Server-sent Events] Status of 26-April-2012 LC comments Arthur Barstow
• Re: CORS security hole? Henry Story
• Re: CORS security hole? Adam Barth
• Re: CORS security hole? Henry Story

Monday, 16 July 2012

• [Bug 17303] Fix editorial issues from Tobie bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17253] [IndexedDB] IDL typo bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17198] Remove mention of IDBVersionChangeRequest bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 16467] [IndexedDB] [editorial] remove spurious IDBVersionChangeRequest-sentence bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 16441] Spec should note that onsuccess shouldn’t be used for writes. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: CORS security hole Adam Barth
• CORS security hole Henry Story
• [Bug 17786] hello, i am just testing websocket, thank you. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17786] New: hello, i am just testing websocket, thank you. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Sunday, 15 July 2012

• [Bug 17032] IndexedDB: Editorial - use of phrase "explicit key" is confusing bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17657] Empty arrays shouldn't be valid KeyPaths bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17276] Step 8 in versionchange transaction algorithm is wrong. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17538] [IndexedDB] Remove error clauses for invalid index keys bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17643] What should transaction.error be set to if a error handler throws an exception bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17236] Ambiguity in IDBTransaction.error around 'done' state bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17609] [IndexedDB] Events fired after transaction abort should not set active flag bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17650] Make createIndex throw InvalidAccessError instead of NotSupportedError bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 13 July 2012

• RE: DOMParser Errors Should Be Exceptions Travis Leithead
• [Bug 17772] New: [URL] The definition of "absolute url" makes https:foo not an absolute url, since its behavior depends on whether the base is https: or not. Is that desired? In particular, using this definition for websockets means that wss: urls with no forward... bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Alec Flett
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Alec Flett

Thursday, 12 July 2012

• [Bug 17765] New: APIs need to take a reference to blob data underlying object URLs bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Jonas Sicking
• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18 Ian Hickson
• Re: [File API] File behavior under modification Arun Ranganathan
• [Bug 17762] New: lastModifiedDate should not be nullable bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Yuval Sadan
• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18 Julian Reschke
• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [Server-Sent Events] Network connection clarification Chaals McCathieNevile
• [Bug 17758] New: Consider using microtasks for autorevoke bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17757] New: Editorial: Add a note about why Blobs aren't Transferable bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Olli Pettay
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Yuval Sadan
• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18 Julian Reschke
• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18 Julian Reschke
• Re: DOMParser Errors Should Be Exceptions Yehuda Katz
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [File API] File behavior under modification Jonas Sicking
• Re: [File API] File behavior under modification Glenn Maynard

Wednesday, 11 July 2012

• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18 Ian Hickson
• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18 Cameron McCormack
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ojan Vafai
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [File API] File behavior under modification Eric U
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ojan Vafai
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ojan Vafai
• Re: [File API] Blob URI creation Arun Ranganathan
• Re: [File API] File behavior under modification Arun Ranganathan
• Re: [File API] File behavior under modification Arun Ranganathan
• [Bug 17746] New: Specify Blob snapshots more robustly bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [File API] File behavior under modification Arun Ranganathan
• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18 Julian Reschke
• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18 Julian Reschke
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ojan Vafai
• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18 Glenn Adams
• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18 Edward O'Connor
• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18 Julian Reschke
• RfC: Content Security Policy 1.0 Last Call; deadline Aug 24 Arthur Barstow
• CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Sockets API; deadline July 18 Arthur Barstow

Tuesday, 10 July 2012

• Re: [Server-Sent Events] Network connection clarification Glenn Maynard
• Re: [Server-Sent Events] Network connection clarification Ian Hickson
• Re: [Server-Sent Events] Network connection clarification Tab Atkins Jr.
• [Bug 17263] Keep on having send(ArrayBuffer data) interface in addition to send(ArrayBufferView data) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 16927] HTML reference was changed from W3C version to WHATWG version bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17224] Possible typo in section 6: Ping and Pong Frames bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17262] send function should have async interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Server-Sent Events] Network connection clarification Kornel Lesiński
• [Bug 16927] HTML reference was changed from W3C version to WHATWG version bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 16730] Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 15719] Under section "Disk Space", there seems to be a word missing in the sentence (see part in parens): "User agents should guard against sites storing data (under the origins other affiliated sites)" Should it have said "under the origins _of_ other affiliate bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 13686] Add example of calling start() on a port bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 16866] EOF is no longer valid as newline so "and the end of the file being the four ways in which a line can end" should be removed. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Server-Sent Events] Network connection clarification Ian Hickson
• [Bug 17736] New: Get "dereference" Blob URI terminology more in keeping with HTML5 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17675] Parameters to slice bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Firefox 16 will ship unprefixed IndexedDB Joshua Bell
• [Bug 17734] please provide how to connect the url and how retrieve the json web service please prove one sample code ,my mail id is rajasekhar@sipl.co.in bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17733] please provide how to connect the url and how retrieve the json web service please prove one sample code ,my mail id is rajasekhar@sipl.co.in bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17732] please provide how to connect the url and how retrieve the json web service please prove one sample code ,my mail id is rajasekhar@sipl.co.in bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17734] New: please provide how to connect the url and how retrieve the json web service please prove one sample code ,my mail id is rajasekhar@sipl.co.in bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17733] New: please provide how to connect the url and how retrieve the json web service please prove one sample code ,my mail id is rajasekhar@sipl.co.in bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17732] New: please provide how to connect the url and how retrieve the json web service please prove one sample code ,my mail id is rajasekhar@sipl.co.in bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Firefox 16 will ship unprefixed IndexedDB Jonas Sicking
• Re: Trialing Web Components Dominic Cooney
• Re: Trialing Web Components Dominic Cooney

Monday, 9 July 2012

• Re: Trialing Web Components rektide
• Re: Trialing Web Components Scott González
• Trialing Web Components rektide
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [XHR] What referrer to use when making requests Adam Barth

Sunday, 8 July 2012

• Re: [XHR] What referrer to use when making requests Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] What referrer to use when making requests Jonas Sicking

Saturday, 7 July 2012

• Re: [XHR] What referrer to use when making requests Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa

Friday, 6 July 2012

• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Jonas Sicking
• [XHR] What referrer to use when making requests Jonas Sicking
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] What should a "native" automatic transaction expose? Ojan Vafai
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? James Graham
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa

Thursday, 5 July 2012

• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Yuval Sadan
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ojan Vafai
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Yuval Sadan
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Yuval Sadan
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? James Graham
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Olli Pettay
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Quota Management API error codes Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Olli Pettay
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Olli Pettay
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ojan Vafai
• Re: Quota Management API error codes Maxime RETY
• [Bug 17702] New: [IndexedDB editorial] IDBIndex.getKey should tell what it's doing bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? James Graham
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Olli Pettay
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Adam Barth
• Re: Quota Management API error codes Jochen Eisinger
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Olli Pettay
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Olli Pettay
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Adam Barth
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ojan Vafai
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Olli Pettay
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Olli Pettay
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Olli Pettay

Wednesday, 4 July 2012

• [UndoManager] What should a "native" automatic transaction expose? Ryosuke Niwa
• [UndoManager] Re-introduce DOMTransaction interface? Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Quota Management API error codes Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 3 July 2012

• Quota Management API error codes Jochen Eisinger

Wednesday, 4 July 2012

• Quota Management API error codes Kinuko Yasuda
• [Bug 17685] New: Hello, Please make the standard web socket api include a spec for an in browser "listener" socket. Meaning: a javascript application is able to create a server listener socket in the browser on the client. Another client can discover this ip (though most bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 3 July 2012

• [Bug 17681] New: [IndexedDB] Operations that raise multiple exceptions types should define order bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• RE: RfC: LCWD of Indexed Database; deadline June 21 Eliot Graff
• [selectors-api] New Implementation Report for Updated Testsuite Lachlan Hunt
• [Bug 17675] New: Parameters to slice bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element Elliott Sprehn

Monday, 2 July 2012

• [Bug 17652] Blob constructor: the blobParts array should probably not have nullable elements bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17656] Rewrite Blob constructor algorithm bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24 Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 16952] Add a Blob.close() bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Saturday, 30 June 2012

• change of affiliation Chaals McCathieNevile

Last message date: Saturday, 29 September 2012 14:59:40 UTC