Re: Lazy Blob

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:

> The subject line says Lazy Blob, not Lazy Blob and XHR. For the record, I
> will object to a LazyBlob solution that is tied solely to XHR, so deal with
> it now rather than later.
>

Then you better get onto specifying a resource/range transfer protocol on
top of websockets alongside with web-server modules/extensions to be able
to understand that protocol, because other than that there is no way that
you'll get what you want.