- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:31:55 +0200
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com>, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>
On Aug 1, 2012, at 21:26 , Glenn Adams wrote: > So? Why should lazy blob be specific to HTTP specific semantics when an arbitrary URL is not specific to HTTP? No one said that they would have to be HTTP specific, but I agree with Florian that I don't see how it could apply to WS. It could, for instance, be made to work fine with FTP or similar resource retrieval protocols. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 08:32:26 UTC