Re: Web Components Suggestion

On Aug 13, 2012 4:49 AM, "Florian Bösch" <pyalot@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>> There is no conceivable conformance checker that's going to allow the use
>> of completely arbitrary tag names. It doesn't matter what formalism it
uses.
>> To allow custom tag names and still be able to check the conformance of
>> normal tag names, the only possibility is to limit the custom tag names
to
>> some recognized prefix -- e.g., x-fancyButton or whatever.
>
> <x:fancy-button>

For clarity, you don't mean literally x:  right?  On the other hand, most
people do mean literally x-.