Re: Lazy Blob

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
>
>> The same reason that a remote blob would be useful with XHR.
>>
> Since you're steadfastly refusing to detail your use case, that'll just
> mean "none" to me.


I feel I don't have any obligation to justify the use of WS any more than
that necessary for XHR. It is simply short-sighted to define a remote blob
only for XHR. If you can't see that, then let's not waste our time
continuing this thread.

Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 20:41:27 UTC