Re: Lazy Blob

On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, Glenn Adams wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, I was vague. What I mean is what user-facing problem is it that 
> > we're trying to solve?
> 
> see DAR's initial message in this thread; bringing WS into scope doesn't 
> change the problem statement, it merely enlarges the solution space, or 
> keeps it from being unnecessarily narrow

Do you have a link to a specific message? I went through the archives and 
couldn't find any e-mails in this thread that came close to describing a 
use case for anything, let alone anything that would be related to 
persistent bi-directional full-duplex communication with a remote server.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 17:01:47 UTC