W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Lazy Blob

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:11:36 -0600
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+d9ngiuL-y7vQ3NzCvOUJqyHLGD6qfXkRST1X7mXFDL6g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com>
Cc: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
>> Further, a default behavior in the absence of such an injection might be
>> defined simply to read data from the WS and stuff into the blob.
> Which kind of defeats the purpose because you wanted to read ranges, so
> not a whole resource has to be transferred, and you can already read binary
> data from websockets if you wish to do that, without having to invent
> another blob.

A default behavior does not have to handle all uses cases. App specific
code injection could handle this if the author wished it, provided a
mechanism supported it.
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 20:12:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:37 UTC