Re: Lazy Blob

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
>
>> Further, a default behavior in the absence of such an injection might be
>> defined simply to read data from the WS and stuff into the blob.
>>
> Which kind of defeats the purpose because you wanted to read ranges, so
> not a whole resource has to be transferred, and you can already read binary
> data from websockets if you wish to do that, without having to invent
> another blob.


A default behavior does not have to handle all uses cases. App specific
code injection could handle this if the author wished it, provided a
mechanism supported it.

Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 20:12:23 UTC