- From: Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 22:04:07 +0100
- To: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <0955006C-03A6-44CB-91DF-571765BE4FAA@gmail.com>
On 21 Aug 2012, at 13:20, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Marcos would like to publish a "Proposed Edited Recommendation" [PER] of the Widget Packaging and XML Configuration spec [REC] to incorporate the spec's errata and this is a Call for Consensus to do so. > > The [Errata] has already been reflected in the [Proposed-PER] (see [Diff]) and it includes a new title of "Packaged Web Apps (Widgets) - Packaging and XML Configuration (Second Edition)". > > Please send all comments regarding this CfC to the public-webapps@w3.org mail list by August 28 and note silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal. If you support this CfC, a positive response is preferred and encouraged. +1 on the new name, I like it. Just one grammatical nit in the Abstract - there is an extra "as" before "commonly": This specification standardizes a packaging format and metadata for a class of software known as commonly as packaged apps or widgets > > -Thanks, AB > > [PER] <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#cfr-edited> > [REC] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-widgets-20110927/> > [Errata] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/errata.html> > [Proposed-PER] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/> > [Diff] <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A//www.w3.org/TR/widgets/&doc2=http%3A//dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2012 21:04:43 UTC