public-sdw-wg@w3.org from March 2017 by date

Friday, 31 March 2017

• Re: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Meta: Use of ORCID iDs on acknowledgements page Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Meta: Use of ORCID iDs on acknowledgements page Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Meta: Use of ORCID iDs on acknowledgements page Jeremy Tandy
• Re: [ssn] Out of schedule meeting to resolve/close issues Raúl García Castro
• Re: another minor edit for BP11 Jeremy Tandy
• Re: another minor edit for BP11 Clemens Portele
• another minor edit for BP11 Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Meta: Use of ORCID iDs on acknowledgements page Jon Blower
• Re: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc Bill Roberts

Thursday, 30 March 2017

• RE: Meta: Use of ORCID iDs on acknowledgements page Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc Jeremy Tandy
• RE: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc Svensson, Lars
• Re: [BP] Reordering the best practices Ed Parsons
• Re: [BP] Reordering the best practices Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Meta: Use of ORCID iDs on acknowledgements page Jeremy Tandy
• Re: [BP] Reordering the best practices Ed Parsons
• Re: Meta: Use of ORCID iDs on acknowledgements page Jon Blower
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Jon Blower
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Clemens Portele
• Re: [BP] Reordering the best practices Jeremy Tandy
• RE: [BP] Reordering the best practices Linda van den Brink
• RE: [BP] Reordering the best practices Linda van den Brink
• Re: [BP] Reordering the best practices Jeremy Tandy
• RE: [BP] Reordering the best practices Linda van den Brink
• Re: [BP] Reordering the best practices Jeremy Tandy
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Jeremy Tandy
• Re: [BP] Reordering the best practices Jeremy Tandy
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Jon Blower
• Re: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Actions in "final" best practice sprint Jeremy Tandy
• RE: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc Francois Daoust
• Re: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc Jeremy Tandy
• RE: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc Linda van den Brink
• Re: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc Jeremy Tandy
• Actions in "final" best practice sprint Jeremy Tandy
• Re: [BP] Reordering the best practices Clemens Portele
• Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc Jeremy Tandy

Wednesday, 29 March 2017

• RE: SDW @ RDA P9? andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• Re: BP doc is ready for publication Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Proposal to fix ISSUE-117 and a question Raúl García Castro
• Re: BP doc is ready for publication Francois Daoust
• [Minutes BP] 2017-03-29 Francois Daoust
• [BP] Reordering the best practices Linda van den Brink
• ACTION-300: Include OBOE alignment ... Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• ACTION-299: Include Sample relation text ... Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: BP sub-group call, Wednesday 29-March, 15:00UTC Svensson, Lars
• [minutes SSN] 2017-03-28 Francois Daoust
• Re: Using rdf:Property class for properties whose URI contains string "time" Raúl García Castro
• [ssn] Out of schedule meeting to resolve/close issues Armin Haller

Tuesday, 28 March 2017

• Re: Using rdf:Property class for properties whose URI contains string "time" Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Using rdf:Property class for properties whose URI contains string "time" Maxime LEFRANCOIS
• Re: Using rdf:Property class for properties whose URI contains string "time" Krzysztof Janowicz
• Using rdf:Property class for properties whose URI contains string "time" Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Timeline to reach REC by end of June for SSN and Time ontologies Jeremy Tandy
• Re: ACTION-282: Draft a note on forecasting to address issue-82. Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: ACTION-282: Draft a note on forecasting to address issue-82. Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: ACTION-282: Draft a note on forecasting to address issue-82. Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Timeline to reach REC by end of June for SSN and Time ontologies Scott Simmons
• Re: BP sub-group call, Wednesday 29-March, 15:00UTC Scott Simmons
• Meta: Use of ORCID iDs on acknowledgements page Andy Mabbett
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Andy Mabbett
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Jeremy Tandy
• Re: BP sub-group call, Wednesday 29-March, 15:00UTC Jeremy Tandy
• RE: BP sub-group call, Wednesday 29-March, 15:00UTC Svensson, Lars
• BP sub-group call, Wednesday 29-March, 15:00UTC Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Timeline to reach REC by end of June for SSN and Time ontologies Jeremy Tandy
• BP doc is ready for publication Jeremy Tandy
• suggest no coverage call this week Bill Roberts
• Fwd: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Ed Parsons
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Ed Parsons
• Re: Timeline to reach REC by end of June for SSN and Time ontologies Scott Simmons
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Frans Knibbe
• Re: Measurement properties for Actuators ? Armin Haller
• Re: About MinCardinality 0 on Observation Armin Haller
• Re: About MinCardinality 0 on Observation Krzysztof Janowicz

Monday, 27 March 2017

• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Andy Mabbett
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Bruce Bannerman
• MeasurementRange is at odds with OperatingRange and SurvivalRange Maxime Lefrançois
• Measurement properties for Actuators ? Maxime Lefrançois
• Timeline to reach REC by end of June for SSN and Time ontologies Francois Daoust
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Jon Blower
• Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 28-03-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC Scott Simmons
• Agenda SSN meeting this week - 28-03-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC Armin Haller
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Frans Knibbe
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Ed Parsons
• RE: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Jon Blower
• RE: About MinCardinality 0 on Observation Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Ed Parsons
• If an observation observes a property, then it also observes the feature of interest of this property ? Maxime Lefrançois
• If an observation used a procedure, then the sensor that made the observation does implement that procedure ? Maxime Lefrançois
• About MinCardinality 0 on Observation Maxime Lefrançois
• ACTION-282: Draft a note on forecasting to address issue-82. Maxime Lefrançois

Sunday, 26 March 2017

• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Bruce Bannerman

Friday, 24 March 2017

• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Andy Mabbett
• RE: SDW @ RDA P9? andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Ed Parsons
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Bruce Bannerman
• RE: SDW @ RDA P9? Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Thursday, 23 March 2017

• RE: SDW @ RDA P9? andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu

Wednesday, 22 March 2017

• Status of OWL-Time Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Tuesday, 21 March 2017

• Re: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• RE: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Kerry Taylor
• RE: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• Re: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• Re: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• Re: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller

Monday, 20 March 2017

• Re: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• Summary of Best Practice sub-group discussions from Day 1 of Delft face-to-face Jeremy Tandy
• Re: [Minutes SSN] 2017 03 15 Phil Archer
• Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Maxime Lefrançois
• Triple Pattern Fragments Rob Atkinson
• General purpose temporal predicates - ISSUE-65 Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: [Minutes SSN] 2017 03 15 Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• OWL-Time: Standard temporal durations = temporal units of measure Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty Maxime Lefrançois
• RE: [Minutes SSN] 2017 03 15 Kerry Taylor
• Coverage JSON vote tomorrow Bill Roberts

Sunday, 19 March 2017

• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Joshua Lieberman

Saturday, 18 March 2017

• Re: QB4ST pull requests Rob Atkinson
• QB4ST pull requests Bill Roberts

Friday, 17 March 2017

• Re: A blog post and a (good? best?) practice Frans Knibbe
• Examples of CoverageJSON documents Jon Blower
• Proposal to fix ISSUE-117 and a question Raúl García Castro
• RE: A blog post and a (good? best?) practice Linda van den Brink

Thursday, 16 March 2017

• A blog post and a (good? best?) practice Frans Knibbe
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Frans Knibbe
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Joshua Lieberman
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Frans Knibbe
• BP document FROZEN - vote next Monday Linda van den Brink
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Rob Atkinson
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Rob Atkinson

Wednesday, 15 March 2017

• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Stephane Fellah
• [Minutes COV] 2017 03 15 Phil Archer
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Jeremy Tandy
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Clemens Portele
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Jeremy Tandy
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Jeremy Tandy
• [Minutes BP] 2017 13 15 Phil Archer
• RE: BP sub-group call Wed 15 March 16:00UTC Svensson, Lars
• Re: Coverage call this week Jon Blower
• [Minutes SSN] 2017 03 15 Phil Archer
• Re: Do we need to reference all three sets of spatial relations from GeoSPARQL in BP14? Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Do we need to reference all three sets of spatial relations from GeoSPARQL in BP14? Jeremy Tandy

Tuesday, 14 March 2017

• RE: BP sub-group call Wed 15 March 16:00UTC andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• Re: Do we need to reference all three sets of spatial relations from GeoSPARQL in BP14? Matthew Perry
• Re: [public-sdw-wg] <none> Joshua Lieberman
• Re: Do we need to reference all three sets of spatial relations from GeoSPARQL in BP14? Ed Parsons
• Re: [public-sdw-wg] <none> Jeremy Tandy
• RE: [public-sdw-wg] <none> Little, Chris
• Do we need to reference all three sets of spatial relations from GeoSPARQL in BP14? Jeremy Tandy
• Re: BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Jeremy Tandy
• Re: BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Joshua Lieberman
• RE: [BP] Updates to BP6 Linda van den Brink
• [public-sdw-wg] <none> Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: [BP] Updates to BP6 Svensson, Lars
• RE: BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Linda van den Brink
• Call review of BPs 14, 17 and 3 Jeremy Tandy
• Re: [BP] Updates to BP6 Jeremy Tandy
• [BP] Updates to BP6 Linda van den Brink
• Re: Coverage call this week Scott Simmons

Monday, 13 March 2017

• Re: BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Bruce Bannerman
• Re: QB4ST comments Rob Atkinson
• RE: QB4ST comments Little, Chris
• Coverage call this week Bill Roberts
• QB4ST comments Bill Roberts
• EO-QB comments Bill Roberts
• Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-03-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC Scott Simmons
• Re: BP sub-group call Wed 15 March 16:00UTC Scott Simmons
• Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-03-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC Armin Haller
• Re: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? Bill Roberts
• Re: BP sub-group call Wed 15 March 16:00UTC Clemens Portele
• RE: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? Svensson, Lars
• BP sub-group call Wed 15 March 16:00UTC Linda van den Brink
• [public-sdw-wg] <none> Rob Atkinson

Saturday, 11 March 2017

• Re: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? Joshua Lieberman
• Re: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? Bill Roberts
• Re: BP: updates to section 12.6, removal of section 12.8 Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? Jeremy Tandy
• Re: BP: updates to section 12.6, removal of section 12.8 Clemens Portele
• Re: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? Jeremy Tandy
• Re: BP: updates to section 12.6, removal of section 12.8 Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? Bill Roberts
• Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? Jeremy Tandy
• BP: updates to section 12.6, removal of section 12.8 Clemens Portele

Friday, 10 March 2017

• RE: BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• RE: BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Linda van den Brink

Thursday, 9 March 2017

• Re: BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification Jeremy Tandy
• Re: BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification Clemens Portele
• BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Is SDW-BP section 12.8 "Dealing with large datasets" needed anymore? Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Is SDW-BP section 12.8 "Dealing with large datasets" needed anymore? Clemens Portele
• Is SDW-BP section 12.8 "Dealing with large datasets" needed anymore? Jeremy Tandy
• Re: SOSA/SSN namespaces - ontology Armin Haller
• Extended 2 hour SDW SSN subgroup calls Armin Haller
• Re: SOSA/SSN namespaces - ontology Rob Atkinson

Wednesday, 8 March 2017

• Re: SOSA/SSN namespaces - ontology Armin Haller
• RE: Naming the properties between FeatureOfInterest, xxxProperty, {Actuator/Sensor}, {Actuation/Observation} [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: ISSUE-144 - OWL-Time - missing interval relations Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• SOSA/SSN namespaces - ontology Rob Atkinson
• apologies for SDW call tonight Bill Roberts
• w3c/ogc sdw wg time ISSUES Little, Chris
• Re: summary of open discussion threads for BP doc as input to plenary call 8-March-2017 Ghislain Atemezing
• RE: ACTION-257: Ask sefki kolozali to make proposal around trss for the owl time ontology (Spatial Data on the Web Working Group) Little, Chris
• Re: summary of open discussion threads for BP doc as input to plenary call 8-March-2017 Jeremy Tandy
• Re: summary of open discussion threads for BP doc as input to plenary call 8-March-2017 Ghislain Atemezing
• RE: ISSUE-144 - OWL-Time - missing interval relations Little, Chris
• Re: summary of open discussion threads for BP doc as input to plenary call 8-March-2017 Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: summary of open discussion threads for BP doc as input to plenary call 8-March-2017 Jeremy Tandy
• summary of open discussion threads for BP doc as input to plenary call 8-March-2017 Jeremy Tandy
• RE: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting - 8th March 20:00 GMT Francois Daoust
• Re: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting - 8th March 20:00 GMT Kolozali, Sefki
• RE: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting - 8th March 20:00 GMT andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• RE: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting - 8th March 20:00 GMT Little, Chris
• [Minutes SSN] 2017-03-07 Francois Daoust
• RE: ISSUE-144 - OWL-Time - missing interval relations Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Naming the properties between FeatureOfInterest, xxxProperty, {Actuator/Sensor}, {Actuation/Observation} Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Naming the properties between FeatureOfInterest, xxxProperty, {Actuator/Sensor}, {Actuation/Observation} Armin Haller
• Naming the properties between FeatureOfInterest, xxxProperty, {Actuator/Sensor}, {Actuation/Observation} Maxime Lefrançois

Tuesday, 7 March 2017

• RE: [w3c/sdw] implemented resolution 10 to 13 of call 28-02-17 (#592) Kerry Taylor
• RE: SSN - alignment of OBOE to SOSA Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• SSN integration: comments on options, Rob Atkinson
• regrets for SSN call today Scott Simmons
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API Jeremy Tandy
• More updates to CRS-related best practices Jeremy Tandy
• Re: A few issues and questions about SOSA, and a very nice picture ! Maxime Lefrançois
• RE: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Kerry Taylor
• RE: A few issues and questions about SOSA, and a very nice picture ! Kerry Taylor
• Re: [w3c/sdw] implemented resolution 10 to 13 of call 28-02-17 (#592) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: [w3c/sdw] implemented resolution 10 to 13 of call 28-02-17 (#592) Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Lars's comments on the BP document (was: BP document is FROZEN pending vote to release next WD) Jeremy Tandy
• RE: Lars's comments on the BP document (was: BP document is FROZEN pending vote to release next WD) Svensson, Lars

Monday, 6 March 2017

• Re: Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the licenses themselves) Scott Simmons
• Re: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting - 8th March 20:00 GMT p.barnaghi@surrey.ac.uk
• Re: Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the licenses themselves) Joshua Lieberman
• RE: Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the licenses themselves) Francois Daoust
• Re: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting - 8th March 20:00 GMT Clemens Portele
• RE: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting - 8th March 20:00 GMT Linda van den Brink
• SDW Next Plenary Meeting - 8th March 20:00 GMT Ed Parsons
• RE: Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the licenses themselves) Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Agenda SSN meeting this week - 07-03-17 21:00 UTC Armin Haller
• [BP] Next WD release Linda van den Brink
• RE: Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the licenses themselves) andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the licenses themselves) Raúl García Castro

Sunday, 5 March 2017

• RE: Best Practices presentation Kerry Taylor
• updates to BP17 (coordinate reference systems) Jeremy Tandy
• SSN - alignment of OBOE to SOSA Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Friday, 3 March 2017

• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API Rob Atkinson
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API Jeremy Tandy
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API Bart van Leeuwen
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API Jeremy Tandy
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API Joshua Lieberman
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API Ed Parsons
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API Jeremy Tandy
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API Jeremy Tandy
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API Ed Parsons
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API Jeremy Tandy
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API Clemens Portele
• CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API Jeremy Tandy
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API Matthew Perry
• Updates to BP detailed plan for this sprint Jeremy Tandy
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API Scott Simmons
• RE: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 13 - Provide subsets for large spatial datasets andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• RE: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• RE: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 13 - Provide subsets for large spatial datasets Linda van den Brink
• RE: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API Linda van den Brink

Thursday, 2 March 2017

• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 13 - Provide subsets for large spatial datasets Jeremy Tandy
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API Ed Parsons
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 13 - Provide subsets for large spatial datasets Clemens Portele
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 13 - Provide subsets for large spatial datasets Jeremy Tandy
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API Jeremy Tandy
• topics for SDW plenary call next week (8 March) Jeremy Tandy
• Re: [w3c/sdw] Implementation of isObservedBy issue https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/… (#591) Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Respec problem? Clemens Portele

Wednesday, 1 March 2017

• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• Re: Best Practices presentation Armin Haller
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• Re: Respec problem? Rob Atkinson
• WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API Clemens Portele
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 13 - Provide subsets for large spatial datasets Clemens Portele
• Re: Sampling model Maxime LEFRANCOIS
• Re: Sampling model Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: Cross-referencing examples (was: BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc) andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• [Minutes BP] 2017-03-01 call Francois Daoust
• Cross-referencing examples (was: BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc) Francois Daoust
• Re: Best Practices presentation Jeremy Tandy
• Re: BP 11 - 'convenience APIs' Jeremy Tandy
• RE: Rendering problem of BP doc on GH andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• Re: BP 11 - 'convenience APIs' Clemens Portele
• Re: BP 11 - 'convenience APIs' Jeremy Tandy
• Re: BP 11 - 'convenience APIs' Jeremy Tandy
• Re: BP 11 - 'convenience APIs' Clemens Portele
• Re: BP 11 - 'convenience APIs' Jeremy Tandy
• RE: Rendering problem of BP doc on GH Francois Daoust
• RE: Rendering problem of BP doc on GH andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• RE: Rendering problem of BP doc on GH Linda van den Brink
• BP 11 - 'convenience APIs' Clemens Portele
• RE: BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• Re: Respec problem? Clemens Portele
• RE: Respec problem? andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• Rendering problem of BP doc on GH andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• Respec problem? Clemens Portele
• RE: Best Practices presentation Linda van den Brink
• RE: BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc Svensson, Lars
• RE: Sampling model Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Best Practices presentation Armin Haller

Last message date: Friday, 31 March 2017 22:08:28 UTC